- Sep 17, 2007
- 24,961
- 22,931
3 in binary is 11 so I wasn't that far off
There are 10 types of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who don't.
3 in binary is 11 so I wasn't that far off
There are 10 types of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who don't.
There are 10 types of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who don't.
As one of the last Halverson holdouts around, I have to respond to this because it's really shortsighted.
Halverson was drafted not as a star, but as a goalie on a stacked team that showed flashes of tremendous ability along with good size and athleticism for the position. His D+1 year, he was pretty good, but his Soo team crapped out in the semis despite being favorites to win. His D+2 year, he was not particularly good at all on a less-talented Soo team. Still, he had his moments; I remember watching them.
Then he gets to Hartford and has to compete with Hellberg and Skakpski, both of whom had been decent AHL goalies prior to that point and had a few NHL starts. Everyone that year was horrible. Halverson saw 9 ECHL games but also 26 AHL games, which is not unreasonable for someone making his pro debut who was still very much a work in progress. He wasn't good, anywhere.
His next year (last season) he again had to compete for a job. Mazanec, a guy with limited but actual NHL experience, was obviously going to get starts as you want someone in the AHL who can step into NHL action when needed, ideally. Georgiev they liked a lot, enough to sign him to an ELC right out of Liiga when otherwise the roster was generally set. When Mazanec went down it could have presented an opportunity for any of the other guys (Nell got it but was horrible) and Georgiev stepped up. His play down the stretch was the best we had in Hartford in years, and then he was good in the NHL to boot. Meanwhile Halverson was down being mediocre in Greenville, where nothing separated him from some guy named Ty Rimmer and a half-dozen other pieces of garbage.
Yeah, he posted a .906 SV% in Hartford. It was five games. Mazanec was at .905 through 20 games. Georgiev was at .909 through 37 games. Arguing the merits of a player at any position because of five games is just ridiculous on so many fronts.
Jump forward to this year. He's going to compete with three guys that have actual NHL experience, including the one guy who the team clearly views as a piece of the future in Georgiev. Where does Halverson fit in? At no point had he done anything to lead anyone to believe he was capable of being a productive AHL starter for more than five games (which weren't even all good, by the way). So he goes to Maine to get minutes. There is nothing unreasonable about sending a young goalie to the ECHL when he has not shown he is capable of playing in the AHL. The fact that he is a former second round pick is irrelevant at this point; you don't assign players to levels based on their draft position four years after the fact. You put them where they belong. He belonged in the ECHL.
And now, maybe--maybe!--he is starting to figure it out in Maine, as I've noted a few times. His play has been the best it has ever been! It has actually been good. Which is nice, because for the first time as a pro, he's the undisputed starter for his team--which obviously was not going to happen before, and in a part time capacity he just wasn't cutting it.
Maybe he has put himself in line for a call-up later in the year. He has to keep up his play. The fact of it is, he's a third-year pro doing well in the ECHL. That doesn't win you any points. The team owes us nothing. Scratch that--they owe that they'll place the kids where they belong, like Gropp and Ronning in the ECHL. He doesn't automatically get to come up and displace guys that are way more established than him. The reason he started in Hartford was so he could continue to get starts while better players (to this point) played in Hartford. He's where he is due to nothing but his own mediocrity to this point in his career. No one to blame but himself. But, he appears to maybe be developing, turning a corner. Hopefully he keeps it up. If he does he'll get a chance--he's had chances before and just never really seized them.
Anyway, I never thought I'd dedicate this many words to Halverson. Even in defending him I usually keep it brief.![]()
There are 10 types of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who don't.
thanks for this, always good to have another geek joke
See, and I think that there are only two. There are people that I trust and there are those that don't eat lamb.There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand hexadecimal, and F the rest
It would be huge if he could become an nhl regular. Rangers would be able to trade some D for assets eventually.Tarmo Reunanen had an assist today, he's having an amazing season for Lukko emerging as their 2nd (or even best?) D-man. Playing all situations (though not a lot on the PP), shooting a lot (Over 3 shot attempts per game, 95 in 28 games), driving play (CF% 53, +1.8 Rel) and scoring at a good pace. Looked a bit grim when he was jerked around by TPS but i think there is an NHL D-man in there.
People are sleeping on Riley Hughes. You will say he is in the BCHL etc etc. You have to see him play. He is very skilled.
This is about the fifth time you've come into the thread to make this exact statement. Which I don't really understand because since the season started he hasn't done anything to either bolster or weaken the claim. He's hovered at a couple points below or above a point per game average all year, playing Newhook's wing.People are sleeping on Riley Hughes. You will say he is in the BCHL etc etc. You have to see him play. He is very skilled.
People in hockey say that the BCHL has improved quite a bit the last few years leading to overall lower scoring stats. Year to year comps may not be valid.
I know Fogarty played with the Reilly brothers--one of whom is now an NHL defenseman. I'm kind of thinking he's the only one from that team to really make it.