Rangers Prospect Ranking: (Summer 2019) - #3

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
  • We're expeting server maintenance on March 3rd starting at midnight, there may be downtime during the work.

#3 Prospect


  • Total voters
    192
  • Poll closed .

The Crypto Guy

Registered User
Jun 26, 2017
29,205
38,881
Ranger's Summer 2019 Prospect Ranking

1. Kaapo Kakko (F) (2019 Draft - 1st round) (Not Ranked) - (97%)
2. Vitali Kravtsov (F) (2018 Draft - 1st round) (-1) - (77%)

cut.jpg




Added: Libor Hajek (D)
Please tell me who you want added
 
Flip side of my previous post. Kravtsov beat Shesterkin, so the latter is who I vote for here.

Add Rykov. (Is Georgiev still eligible?)
 
Remember a few months ago when people had andersson higher than miller? Lol

Kakko
Kravtsov
Shesterkin
Miller
Fox

Top 5
 
I kind of feel awkward including Andersson and Georgiev in this poll.

49 and 43 games respectively over two seasons.
The old HF standard was 65 games for a skater and 45 games for a goalie before the completion of their age 24 season. With some other things for Euros and NCAA guys.
 
The old HF standard was 65 games for a skater and 45 games for a goalie before the completion of their age 24 season. With some other things for Euros and NCAA guys.

Gosh that seems high to me for some reason, especially spread over a couple of years.

Scratch my original comment than. Add Georgiev.
 
I wish the site as a whole would just pick an age and go with it. Seems silly that no one has a problem with the 23 year old goalie being on this list, but the 20 year old forward should be considered graduated because he played half a season in the NHL.

Best U25 players should be the standard across the board. All players that could/should still be improving and still under contract control for a couple years minimum.
 
I wish the site as a whole would just pick an age and go with it. Seems silly that no one has a problem with the 23 year old goalie being on this list, but the 20 year old forward should be considered graduated because he played half a season in the NHL.

Best U25 players should be the standard across the board. All players that could/should still be improving and still under contract control for a couple years minimum.
Well, the standard I mentioned above was the Hockey's Future standard, and they used it across the site in prospect rankings, articles, etc. It was generally the standard all the boards used as well. Since Hockey's Future proper is dead, we could come up with our own standard, but can you imagine the fight that would lead to here? :laugh: I've always thought it was just easier to use a preexisting standard that was generally accepted. JMO, though.
 
Well, the standard I mentioned above was the Hockey's Future standard, and they used it across the site in prospect rankings, articles, etc. It was generally the standard all the boards used as well. Since Hockey's Future proper is dead, we could come up with our own standard, but can you imagine the fight that would lead to here? :laugh: I've always thought it was just easier to use a preexisting standard that was generally accepted. JMO, though.

:laugh: yea it seriously would be more trouble than it's worth and probably more work for the mods than it's worth. Might as well just keep it as it is though I would like it adjusted as well.
 
As the lone Miller voter in the last thread, I’m going with Miller again in this one.

Add Rykov (still protesting Georgiev’s inclusion)

Edit: there was one other Miller voter, not sure I’ve seen the username before.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad