H00fHearted
Registered User
- Jun 20, 2018
- 203
- 371
Robertson.
Add Lindbom.
Please don't shun me.
So the main boards are doing a Team Prospect Ranking....Ranger's are running away as the #1 prospect pool. Gotta say that's a pretty damn good feeling
HF ranking prospect pools #1
I legit completely forgot that Lindbom was even an option. Hopefully he will have forced his way into the conversation more by the time our post-WJC poll comes around.
Imagine if Gorton didn't have temporary insanity and chose the BPA non-goalie, our pool would be even better. Sigh.
It really is too bad that they decided to go the goaltender path with that pick.
I find myself wondering if Gorton announcing this year that "we won't be taking a goalie" with our first round pick wasn't a bit of a wry call-back to the minor online uproar that came with the Lindbom selection.
Also, I will say that HFNYR has been surprisingly mature in separating hate for the pick from opinions of the prospect (albeit, in my case, I keep going long periods of time forgetting that the kid exists*).
*I just lost The Game
Imagine if Gorton didn't have temporary insanity and chose the BPA non-goalie, our pool would be even better. Sigh.
What else could it have been?
Yea maybe but it doesn’t change the fact that it was a very bad pick at the time, no matter how you slice it.I'm not giving up on Olof at all. There's something there.
Yea maybe but it doesn’t change the fact that it was a very bad pick at the time, no matter how you slice it.
A goalie ranked much later on that got chosen at the beginning of the 2nd round, with a boatload of ex-1st rounders available? That’s pretty bad to me.It's also not as bad as people make it sound
A goalie ranked much later on that got chosen at the beginning of the 2nd round, with a boatload of ex-1st rounders available? That’s pretty bad to me.
Some of them have had good (or as expected) D+1 years. I don’t know how you can argue that their rankings were completely arbitrary. They were based on plenty of scouts and analysts. Names weren’t just picked out of a hat. But this is the only real bad move that Gorton has made during the rebuild imo, so I can forgive him.Ex-1st rounders? Based on arbitrary rankings, sure.
Some of them have had good (or as expected) D+1 years. I don’t know how you can argue that their rankings were completely arbitrary. They were based on plenty of scouts and analysts. Names weren’t just picked out of a hat. But this is the only real bad move that Gorton has made during the rebuild imo, so I can forgive him.