NYRangers16
Registered User
Ahhhh…..so that's it. Its an agenda thing.
Okay.
You say it like it’s a bad thing. Let’s keep perspective here.
Ahhhh…..so that's it. Its an agenda thing.
Okay.
I can replace the players with 5 - 55 gallon drums, put them on the ice and still defend better than this but it must be the water in FL.
Couldn't be the system or anything like that...Naa lol
Way to move those goalposts
Strome has been great for the Rangers since he got here. All I hear from some posters is he's slow, he has an unsustainable shooting %, blah blah blah. All he has done is produce.
It's not hard to think we might have found another Brassard-type who just develops later and becomes a solid 2C. He's 26 and just entering his prime. This shouldn't be all that surprising.
Strome will obviously never hit his draft expectation.
How’d I do that? I said Panarin is responsible for a lot of his success and therefore not to read too much into his performance. I don’t see a contradiction.
Now I see, he’s the second coming of Brassard who I might add had his best 2 years with us. Previous to his time here he had a high of 17g and 47pts. After leaving he hasn’t hit 40. You might be proving my point![]()
Strome has done a great job since getting here.
The problem is..In reality, he's a 3rd line C on a competitive team.
Never said he wasn't. It would be great to have a 3c that puts up 40-50 points.
Everyone is young, half the team is sick. I wouldnt expect a lot of good stuff this game.
I don't understand this. You're saying Strome is basically garbage without Panarin. And I'm saying that he might just be hitting his stride later than some other players. Again, not shocking if his next 3-4 years are his best, since he's entering his prime.
That doesn't prove your point, since you're basically arguing he's not a good player. He is a good player. He might only be a good player for 3-4 seasons, but right now he's at the beginning of that point, so what's your deal?
This exactly.
Wtf is Howden doing on the PP again? Holy ****