Proposal: Rangers - Habs

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/
Status
Not open for further replies.

BLNY

Registered User
Aug 3, 2004
7,120
5,485
Dartmouth, NS
LaF is not struggling
wasn't McDavid on day 1, but fine we good with that

and the maybe of Wright is too risky

You his mother? Neither he nor Kakko are setting the world on fire. Your rush to come to his defence caused you to completely miss the point of my post: despite his struggles, there's no way the Rangers make that deal as presented.
 

Mandalorian

Screw the tank, just WIN BABY!
Jan 3, 2022
1,277
1,423
In your head, rent free
You his mother? Neither he nor Kakko are setting the world on fire. Your rush to come to his defence caused you to completely miss the point of my post: despite his struggles, there's no way the Rangers make that deal as presented.

People who were saying Kakko should go before Hughes were hilarious. Kakko has been totally outclassed and I bet Rangers are kicking themselves for not taking Seider, Byram or Zegras.
 

Kakko Schmakko

Registered User
Feb 24, 2018
5,033
1,569
Would you do it? Some Habs fans say no. Curious to see what the Rangers say.

* Lafreniere
* Rangers 2022 1st
* Rangers 2023 2nd
* Kravtsov
for
* Habs 2022 1st (unprotected)
* Chiarot (50% retention... sign/trade possible)
* Lehkonen
* Rights to Harris


bad trade for the Rangers. Laf by himself easily gets that return. No idea who Harris is but Rangers don't need Chiarot.
 

Number1RedWingsFan52

Registered User
Mar 17, 2013
40,243
6,038
Winter Haven Florida
Would you do it? Some Habs fans say no. Curious to see what the Rangers say.

* Lafreniere
* Rangers 2022 1st
* Rangers 2023 2nd
* Kravtsov
for
* Habs 2022 1st (unprotected)
* Chiarot (50% retention... sign/trade possible)
* Lehkonen
* Rights to Harris
Pure garbage for Alexix Lafreniere, And you don't even include Cole Caufield in the deal. This is pure rubbish.
 

Oscar Lindberg

Registered User
Dec 14, 2015
16,001
15,324
CA
Bro what were you smokin when you wrote this up? Lmao

Montreal had their chance to win Lafreniere, ya’ll might want to get over it that he’s never going to wear a Habs jersey
 

onlygotmygrade10

Registered User
Mar 1, 2014
167
99
Toronto
This trade is so awful it really needs 'Blockbuster' in front of it. Laughably bad given there's no guarantee as to what pick that first ends up being.
 

Calad

Section 422
Jul 24, 2011
4,043
2,604
Long Island
Just red that NYR might be interested in Toffoli. Don’t know if there is leg to it. Does it even make sense NYR fans?
We need a RW he'd be a decent fit, but we cant take back contracts with term and money as we need to extend Kakko, Strome (or find a replacement) and Blais this coming offseason, then Laf KAndre and Chytil the following offseason.

Maybe if the habs retained 50% we could afford him, but why pay that price when theres a bunch of expiring RWs on the market that will go for a 2nd and prospect or less?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Benstheman

Qwijibo

Registered User
Dec 1, 2014
3,551
3,538
This trade is so awful it really needs 'Blockbuster' in front of it. Laughably bad given there's no guarantee as to what pick that first ends up being.
I’m not defending the proposal in any way. But this would have to be an offseason trade because of the conditions on the Dvorak trade. So the pick position would actually be known at the time of any trade involving Montreal’s 1st
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad