Confirmed with Link: Rangers agree to terms with Patrick Khodorenko

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Getting a top 4 Dman out of an undrafted UFA is a total win. Girardi may have been improperly used, especially towards the end of his tenure as a Ranger, but as others have pointed out, the Rangers could only dream to get the value out of Khodorenko that they got from Girardi.
 
How was he a legit 1D? He was with McDonagh most of his career. Doesn’t make him a 1D. Skjei and Trouba were our first pairing d-men too. But that’s because we didn’t have many options.
Girardi was a first pairing defenseman on the Rangers when they were legitimate contenders. It's not really an arguable point, whether he was an impact player or not. He got all the tough matchups and played PK1 and even some PP too.

Regardless, the point was that it's not really debatable whether or not he had an impact as an undrafted player. He unquestionably did. Whether you think he was good or dislike him as a player for what he was, its inarguable that he was our top RHD for almost his entire time here. Doesn't matter if he was propped up by Staal and McD (he was) or if it was only because we didn't have better options.

You can not be a big fan of his and think he was overused and stuff like that, I certainly have issues with the last few years of his time here. But there's no arguing that he was a key player for many years on the Rangers. Contracts and him falling off a cliff aside, to have an undrafted free agent turn into a player who can play top pair minutes and be a key player for a contending team and even make an all star team and get some norris votes...that's basically among the best case scenarios for players who are UDFA.
 
Staal-Girardi was a great pairing. Gave Ovechkin fits. McDonagh-Girardi was a really good pairing. For probably six or seven years, Girardi was a legitimately good defenseman. Very good.

Then the game got faster, and he couldn't keep up. The fact that he blocked more shots than anyone and didn't miss a game in four years or whatever probably contributed.

If you think he was good for one or two years, you either have a weird bias against him or were too young to remember/weren't watching hockey at the time.
 
Eh... he's 21 already now. He'll be 22 in the early stages of the 20-21 season. Early 2022, he'll be 24. You'd hope he can make it in sooner, if he's going to.

It took Aston-Reece until he was 23-24 to reach the NHL and stick. I won't expect too much, too soon
 
  • Like
Reactions: egelband
True, but hopefully Khodorenko will be more than a bottom end 4th liner along the lines of ZAR.

Don't get your hopes up. Khodorenko is likely an AHL-caliber player who MAYBE reaches the NHL in a bottom 6 role. These UDFAs are the equivalent of 6th and 7th round picks.
 
Don't get your hopes up. Khodorenko is an AHL player who MAYBE reaches the NHL in a bottom 6 role. These UDFAs are the equivalent of 6th and 7th round picks.

Thanks for pointing out to me what I already mocked another poster for pointing out to the rest of us. Everyone knows.

Obviously, I was talking about *if* he develops into an NHLer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mac n Gs
Huh? The guy was our #1 RD for almost a decade. It's not even remotely debatable.

Granted he wasn't great his last few years but there's a solid 4-5 year window where he was a legit first pairing defenseman. In what world was he not an impact player?
He was an incredible defensive defender when he was healthy. Shot-blocking takes a toll, though. In fact, I was hoping Trouba would be somewhere between Girardi and Pronger when he joined, but it doesn’t look like the case. :help:
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad