ChaosAgent
Registered User
- May 8, 2018
- 18,561
- 12,606
Updated top 50 MLB prospect rankings: There's a new No. 1 on our list
Starting with a player making headlines in the majors, let's rank baseball's next wave of future stars.www.espn.com
How stupid would we have looked taking Dylan Crews, who has been anything but stellar in pro ball so far. You never, ever, under any circumstance take a position player (don't care how good they project) over a generational arm talent. Pitching costs more and is harder to find and looking at Crews' #'s compared with other highly selected SEC players proves he wasn't a generational position player. Especially seeing some of the #'s guys like Condon and Cags are putting up this year.
BTW, Skenes is the only guy in the top 50 for the Bucs.
(Skenes new #1, 65 FV......Holiday is the only other 65 at #2)
He has already added a new pitch less than a year after going No. 1 overall as the best draft pitching prospect in more than a decade. His mid-90s splinker is a mix between a sinker and splitter that basically has no equal in the big leagues, and he has thrown it 29% of the time over his first two big league starts. Skenes was already the best pitching prospect in the sport and just invented one of the best pitches in the sport.
(Crews down to 14)
Crews, who went No. 2 overall in the draft, has bounced back after a subpar introduction to Double-A last year, but his 29% strikeout rate and lack of over-the-fence power might surprise some fans given the numbers he put up at LSU. I'm not shocked given that I had some pre-draft concerns.
I wanted Langford and I'm comfortable sticking by that choice.Updated top 50 MLB prospect rankings: There's a new No. 1 on our list
Starting with a player making headlines in the majors, let's rank baseball's next wave of future stars.www.espn.com
How stupid would we have looked taking Dylan Crews, who has been anything but stellar in pro ball so far. You never, ever, under any circumstance take a position player (don't care how good they project) over a generational arm talent. Pitching costs more and is harder to find and looking at Crews' #'s compared with other highly selected SEC players proves he wasn't a generational position player. Especially seeing some of the #'s guys like Condon and Cags are putting up this year.
BTW, Skenes is the only guy in the top 50 for the Bucs.
(Skenes new #1, 65 FV......Holiday is the only other 65 at #2)
He has already added a new pitch less than a year after going No. 1 overall as the best draft pitching prospect in more than a decade. His mid-90s splinker is a mix between a sinker and splitter that basically has no equal in the big leagues, and he has thrown it 29% of the time over his first two big league starts. Skenes was already the best pitching prospect in the sport and just invented one of the best pitches in the sport.
(Crews down to 14)
Crews, who went No. 2 overall in the draft, has bounced back after a subpar introduction to Double-A last year, but his 29% strikeout rate and lack of over-the-fence power might surprise some fans given the numbers he put up at LSU. I'm not shocked given that I had some pre-draft concerns.
I wanted Langford and I'm comfortable sticking by that choice.
Faith is earnedYe of little faith.
These things are teachable though. What he has is not.ONeil Cruz lacks basic fundamentals and it drives me up the wall
Right but they actually need to teach him. That’s my problem hahaThese things are teachable though. What he has is not.
Very fair point.Right but they actually need to teach him. That’s my problem haha
I still have not seen Michael Taylor get one hit this season live. Not one.