Not much new here with Mayo's mock, but I think it does represent one of the less ideal outcomes for us. He has Bazzana up top, and then basically all of the other top 7 college guys going in order, until mocking us Tibbs, and the top two prep guys right after us at 10 and 11.
If that's how it plays out (i.e., if we can't get Kurtz or Montgomery), then I am increasingly of the opinion that the best move is to go with the best prep guy on our board, even if that won't be hugely popular. I don't think the front office really cares about being popular, and at least when it comes to the draft, that's probably a good thing, even though this group hasn't earned the right not to care.
Still, I don't want to undersell Tibbs too much. In some ways he is ideal for us, as he will likely come at a decent slot discount, allowing us to go bigger at our next two picks, which in fairness does seem like an area where we have done well in recent years (Jones, Mlod, Chandler, Harrington). Tibbs is close to an MLB-ready bat, but he won't offer a ton defensively, as he's limited to so-so corner OF or 1B.
It's tricky, because in some sense this hypothetical scenario may make it seem like the consensus is that the two prep players don't belong in the first tier of players, and that is the way some lists tend to be written (I haven't seen McDaniel's, so I don't know there).
I remain pretty focused on Kurtz, who Mayo has going 6th here, but the interesting wrinkle is that he has both college pitchers going 7 and 8. I really have no idea, but my assumption is that at least some of the college pitching and one of the prep players will go in that 5-7 range. My sense is that the danger teams for Kurtz are Oakland and St. Louis, but there are still too many moving parts to really do more than guess.