DJ Spinoza
Registered User
- Aug 7, 2003
- 25,984
- 4,580
Reynolds out today with back spasms. Losing last night was a big issue.
40% of the way there in the 2ndThey'll probably put up 10 today somehow.
How many "rumors" are we going to get regarding the Orioles and their top prospects for our top players. What is this weird obsession with the Orioles, specifically, with the local media when they are making this stuff up?
I loved his dad on the Pirates, and he plays a hard nosed style, so if they could get him, I'd be for it.An interesting point made on the broadcast right now is how few teams are actually truly "out" of it right now. There are only 8 teams in the MLB that are more than 5 games out of a wildcard spot right now, which is obviously going to limit how many teams are actually selling.
I doubt he'd be available, but another name I havent' seen mentioned as an option. How would people feel about targeting Varsho to be their CF?
I loved his dad on the Pirates, and he plays a hard nosed style, so if they could get him, I'd be for it.
I want to see them bring in someone to at least show the team, and the fans, they are trying to get better.He doesn't solve the bats issue, but he's a defensive monster in CF with a career OPS+ of 96. Worse bat than Chisholm but miles better defensively.
Chisholm in LF, Varsho in CF and Reynolds in RF looks like a downright terrific OF to me.
Probably hard to get anyone without ties to TOR or Canada to play for them lolRandom note - has there ever been a professional sports team with more kids of MLB players than the Blue Jays? Bichette, Guerrero, Varsho, Biggio - it's fairly crazy how many they have.
I think BIggio was DFA'd, but yea, they could almost field a team of son's of former MLB players.Random note - has there ever been a professional sports team with more kids of MLB players than the Blue Jays? Bichette, Guerrero, Varsho, Biggio - it's fairly crazy how many they have.
Yeah, I was thinking we should have gone with the reliever there. Credit to Perez, he kept the ball on the edges and stepped up in every big spot today.I get that this inning happened quickly but I really wonder if you didn't have the "5 innings for the win" rule if Perez would facing Contreras here.
With an off day tomorrow and everyone other than Mlod fresh, I'd pull the plug now.Yeah, I was thinking we should have gone with the reliever there. Credit to Perez, he kept the ball on the edges and stepped up in every big spot today.
I would honestly bank the 5 innings and just move on, though his pitch count is in fine shape, so maybe you have it be touch and go if he gets the first out of the next inning. The Cardinals bats are almost as cold as ours this season, and it's not like he's been in huge trouble today a bunch.
It's a weird call, because presumably it would be good to get Priester some work in this game. You could potentially ride Priester for at least the 6th and 7th, if not the 8th or beyond, especially if we add on.
And on a related note, the Braves could also be in play now - they are an annoyingly good organization but losing Strider, Acuna, Albies, and Fried is an absurd run of injuries to your top players.We're not really in any position to be looking the Brewers way just yet IMO, but sounds like they might have lost Yelich for a significant amount of time/the season last night.
Yeah, my thought is try Priester as a guy to come in for multiple innings and if he gets into any trouble, just fire all the weapons you have. 4 innings isn't a ton for a fresh bullpen to cover, even if Priester melts down in the 6th.With an off day tomorrow and everyone other than Mlod fresh, I'd pull the plug now.