Legend123
Registered User
- Jul 3, 2016
- 9,922
- 5,108
Wont have a value till he gets on the ice for games that matter
if he goes out and gets no goals in 40 games---what value will he have
by that logic, every single player is worth nothing
Wont have a value till he gets on the ice for games that matter
if he goes out and gets no goals in 40 games---what value will he have
by that logic, every single player is worth nothing
how many games did Rado play in the NHL last year?
you are over looking that point that I was making
you are being silly--he has not stepped foot on an nhl ice for four years and someone who takes in about a dozen or KHL games a year--the KHL is not as good as many want us to believe
You wouldn't say that if you actually watch him play.
He plays hard w/ alot of intensity, he's not a floater. Someone who has unbelievable talent and is a hard worker is very unlikely to fail in the NHL. Guy is really strong on his skates too, he's a tank.
He'll have a 60 point season at the very minimum, could also reach 70. He's an elite playmaker.
how many games did Rado play in the NHL last year?
you are over looking that point that I was making
you are being silly--he has not stepped foot on an nhl ice for four years and someone who takes in about a dozen or KHL games a year--the KHL is not as good as many want us to believe
What exactly do you mean by never finish what he starts? Cause of the one time he was 20 and went home mid contract? Sit down, your hate of Russians is showing.
Frankly, he's packed up and left so many times that they'd have a difficult time getting market value for the guy.
Even if he sets the league on fire - Nobody is giving up full-package assets for him. If they trade him, i expect they'll have to do so at 75 cents on the dollar, because what GM in his right mind would take the guy at his word that he's not going to run back to the KHL the first time something doesn't go his way?
Helluva talent, but he's got a (well-earned) reputation for having a ten-cent head, and the decisions he made in his 20s may have been mistakes that a younger man made, but they're going to stick to him forever as far as the cost of cash or assets to acquire him is concerned.
If he's half the player montreal expects him to be, they'll probably find that the value proposition is to keep him.
So Radulov is what, a potato on skates because he plays in an inferior league? He has a large list of records and is the best scorer in khl league history. To imply he won't make a dent in the NHL when a decade ago he was at least a good second liner is iffy at best.
Not saying he'all be god on ice but the guy is one of the best Russian players alive. Even international competitions show that.
He looks amazing in the preseason, tho
It's a one year deal. They wouldn't be retaining.
As for value, it's way too early.
Ye cause a lot of contenders can take on his cap hit at the deadline. Very likely to retain something if he is traded at the deadline
he isnt the kind of guy contending teams are gonna target.
whats the market for a guy who got benched the last time he was in the playoffs because he was out partying the night before a game?
The contract will mostly be paid out by then.
Still has 5,75 cap hit or am i missing something?
No evidence of laziness. Rather the opposite.
Panarin is not 75% as good of a hockey player as Radulov and he tore up the NHL in his first season over here.
I doubt the Habs will be out of the playoffs if he plays well