Discipline Daddy
Brentcent Van Burns
Exactly. The narrative changes from the Canes suck because they are outchancing and can't buy a goal to the Canes played their A game and barely were able to win. Not enough credit is given to the Canes playing great defensive hockey and limiting the Caps to scant scoring chances in the entire game.The main board discourse is an interesting case study in sports psychology. What makes you feel better the morning after:
Playing like ass and getting blown out
Playing like ass and losing a close one
Playing like ass and winning
Playing great and losing
Playing great and winning a close one
Playing great and winning a blowout
An analogy:
The Canes shoot from everywhere, yes. Imagine shots from far out as $1 bills and shots near the top of the circles as $5s and shots in close as $20s. The Canes have a lot of $1 bills, yes. Their identity to fans of other teams as that they aren't worth much because all they have is $1s. It's like the Canes had twenty $1s, ten $5s, and seven $20s. However, the Caps had six $1s, four $5s, and 4 $20s.
The same fans who bitch about the Canes having lots of low-percentage shots never realize that the Canes also routinely have more high danger shots than their opponent. Sure, the low-chance shots usually don't go in, but the high-chance ones do, and they had more of those as well.
Plus, if we play offense all night and the Caps play defense and block 30 shots a night, we're going to see the same effect at the end of the series as we did versus the Devils: tired bodies.