ORRFForever
Registered User
- Oct 29, 2018
- 17,815
- 12,489
Why shouldn't it have counted?...no, Wright was playing sound defense; Byfield grabbed Wright's stick and did his General Grievous move...pretty goal, shouldn't have counted...
Why shouldn't it have counted?...no, Wright was playing sound defense; Byfield grabbed Wright's stick and did his General Grievous move...pretty goal, shouldn't have counted...
Why shouldn't it have counted?
Wow. Thanks!...cuz he was holding Wright's stick to the point it was parallel with the ice...that's a penalty...
Coolest goal since O.V. on his back!I typed out like 4 responses to this, but I don’t even have the words to describe this goal.
If this isn’t goal of the year then what are we even doing?
Which makes it even more impressive. That's high IQ to be concentrating on doing 2 things at onceYeah, that's a penalty. I feel like it rings hollow to say "wow, he only had one hand" when the reason he had one hand was because he was illegally preventing the other guy from defending him with the other hand.
Which makes it even more impressive. That's high IQ to be concentrating on doing 2 things at once
First thing I thought when I watched it.Coolest goal since O.V. on his back!
Why?Would rather he stay under the radar and not make Team Canada next year
He's even still holding when he turns around to score, lol....cuz he was holding Wright's stick to the point it was parallel with the ice...that's a penalty...
I’m American and see him as a difference makerWhy?
I doubt he will make it. Canada is LOADED up front.
He's even still holding when he turns around to score, lol.
Fair enough.I’m American and see him as a difference maker
Yeah, that's a penalty. I feel like it rings hollow to say "wow, he only had one hand" when the reason he had one hand was because he was illegally preventing the other guy from defending him with the other hand.