The Kings should have been assertive that Turcotte return to school, work on his shot (1 goal in 21 conference games) and to take advantage of the lighter schedule and live in the world-class weight room to gain weight.
AHL schedules most of their games on weekends too. He would've had a similar "lighter schedule" and a world-class weight room to work on his game and body.
I think the injuries have been the biggest factor in his development. Now, are the injuries because he's playing in the AHL against the pros? We'll never know for sure.
Regarding Byfield, there's always been a large contingent that thought their lottery picks who have nothing more to gain in juniors and aren't quite ready for the NHL, should be allowed to play in the AHL.
There are GMs or NHL people who always wanted to do it and you saw a lot of that last year with other top 10 picks (not top 3 obviously).
If only looking at top 3 picks, compared to Lafreniere, who played in the NHL to start, is Byfield any worse off right now in their D+2 seasons? Not sure.
Is Stutzle a better player in his second NHL season? Not sure either.
I think there's something to be said about the Kings development system for skilled forwards just by looking at their recent history since the Lombardi era.
But I'm not so sure the "path" they had these guys on were necessarily incorrect.
They've had a bunch of guys on "conventional" development paths, and only Simmonds, Schenn, Toffoli and Kempe(hopefully?) has become top 6 forwards. And 2 of them didn't turn into one until they left the organization.
I still think Turcotte can turn into a very good 2C in a couple of years especially if he can stop getting injured.
And I think Byfield will still overcome whatever bad development he gets because top 3 picks usually do that. He just needs a longer stick.