Quinn Hughes vs Cale Makar: 2023 Edition

Who is the better player this season?

  • Quinn Hughes

    Votes: 116 60.7%
  • Cale Makar

    Votes: 75 39.3%

  • Total voters
    191
  • Poll closed .

Rowlet

Registered User
Sponsor
Oct 13, 2018
4,402
5,180
Regular season or playoffs ?

Nashville showed you dump it in Quinn’s corner and play the body and he shrivels

Hughes had 59%cf (+17rel), 58%ff (+16rel), and 58.5%xG (+12.5rel) in the playoffs.

I guess "shriveling" includes having better possession stats than the regular season, as well as having better possession stats than McDavid.
 

NeverForget06

Here we go again !
Jan 7, 2013
6,924
6,091
Edmonton
Hughes had 59%cf (+17rel), 58%ff (+16rel), and 58.5%xG (+12.5rel) in the playoffs.

I guess "shriveling" includes having better possession stats than the regular season, as well as having better possession stats than McDavid.
You're right I'd rather have the guy with zero goals but better possession stats than the guy who scored the 4th most points in a single playoff run in the history of the NHL

I almost think you're trolling me here
 

Romang67

BitterSwede
Jan 2, 2011
31,287
24,680
Evanston, IL
You're right I'd rather have the guy with zero goals but better possession stats than the guy who scored the 4th most points in a single playoff run in the history of the NHL

I almost think you're trolling me here
You said Hughes shriveled in the playoffs. Don't go and get all upset when someone posts stats that go against that narrative.
 

Rowlet

Registered User
Sponsor
Oct 13, 2018
4,402
5,180
You're right I'd rather have the guy with zero goals but better possession stats than the guy who scored the 4th most points in a single playoff run in the history of the NHL

I almost think you're trolling me here

Yes, it's true, facts have a pro-Hughes bias.

You said he shriveled in the playoffs and I showed you the actual stats, because yes, he performed better than he did in the regular season, and yes, he had better possession numbers than McDavid, both by raw numbers and by relative to team.

edit: also I never said Hughes was better than McDavid, but that they controlled play at similar levels during the playoffs.
 
Last edited:

NeverForget06

Here we go again !
Jan 7, 2013
6,924
6,091
Edmonton
You said Hughes shriveled in the playoffs. Don't go and get all upset when someone posts stats that go against that narrative.

Yes, it's true, facts have a pro-Hughes bias.

You said he shriveled in the playoffs and I showed you the actual stats, because yes, he performed better than he did in the regular season, and yes, he had better possession numbers than McDavid, both by raw numbers and by relative to team.

edit: also I never said Hughes was better than McDavid, but that they controlled play at similar levels during the playoffs.
You can yap all you want about possession numbers but he scored zero goals.... Stanley Cups aren't won based solely on xGF - you need to be able to compete physically for four rounds and I don't think he can do it
 

Rowlet

Registered User
Sponsor
Oct 13, 2018
4,402
5,180
You can yap all you want about possession numbers but he scored zero goals.... Stanley Cups aren't won based solely on xGF - you need to be able to compete physically for four rounds and I don't think he can do it

I mean.... sure I agree with that, but I never said he did, you're fighting a scarecrow.

You said he shriveled and you were wrong. He played better than he did in the regular season.
 

Romang67

BitterSwede
Jan 2, 2011
31,287
24,680
Evanston, IL
You can yap all you want about possession numbers but he scored zero goals.... Stanley Cups aren't won based solely on xGF - you need to be able to compete physically for four rounds and I don't think he can do it
So you're basing your claim about "shriveling in the playoffs" off of how he had 0 goals scored?

A statistic?

What you think or don't think he would be able to do over 4 rounds hardly seems relevant in whether he shriveled last playoffs.
 

benfranklin

Registered User
Jun 29, 2024
413
298
The amount of Canucks fans who need to whip it out for no reason comparing these two. Im actually excited to watch Quinn and the gang whoop Canada's ass in Italy in 2 years.
The most truthful post in this shitshow poll.
Hmm show me some advanced analytics dong backflips of how he has been better the past 15 months. Points wise, it appears close, but he is still lacking as he has his entire career.

Quinn: 97 GP - 20g 88a 108p 1.11 ppg - 91.3 point 82 game pace
Cale: 95 GP - 27g 88a 115p 1.21 ppg - 99.3 point 82 game pace
 

Phrasing

Registered User
Nov 16, 2007
4,897
3,219
The amount of Canucks fans who need to whip it out for no reason comparing these two. Im actually excited to watch Quinn and the gang whoop Canada's ass in Italy in 2 years.

Hmm show me some advanced analytics dong backflips of how he has been better the past 15 months. Points wise, it appears close, but he is still lacking as he has his entire career.

Quinn: 97 GP - 20g 88a 108p 1.11 ppg - 91.3 point 82 game pace
Cale: 95 GP - 27g 88a 115p 1.21 ppg - 99.3 point 82 game pace
Hughes has been more sound defensively. Strictly offense, he’s not quite as good. Unless you’re forgetting who won the Norris.
 

Rowlet

Registered User
Sponsor
Oct 13, 2018
4,402
5,180
Hmm show me some advanced analytics dong backflips of how he has been better the past 15 months. Points wise, it appears close, but he is still lacking as he has his entire career.

Quinn: 97 GP - 20g 88a 108p 1.11 ppg - 91.3 point 82 game pace
Cale: 95 GP - 27g 88a 115p 1.21 ppg - 99.3 point 82 game pace

Since the start of the 23-24 regular season to today at 5v5:

Makar:
CF%: 53.24%
FF%: 52.85%
G%: 52.15%
XG%: 53.71%
HDCF: 53.81%
HDGF: 45.78%
O-Zone start: 70.21%

Hughes:

CF%: 58.15%
FF%: 56.03%
G%: 62.64%
XG%: 56.05%
HDCF: 54.99%
HDGF: 62.86%
O-Zone start: 60.09%

I even went ahead and included o-zone starts despite them being generally useless, because I know how much you like them! Makars are good, but Hughes' are just flat out better in every instance.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: Realgud and Coffee

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad