Bouboumaster
Registered User
- Jul 4, 2014
- 10,831
- 9,332
It's funny how the league twists and turns it's reviews and processes/rules leading to stupid unintended outcomes.
Here's my take on the call. The ref(s) called it a major to err on the side of caution, what's the harm, not a big push but the player went into boards hard, call it a major and we and always knock it down but can't do the opposite. That is somewhat common.
Then by their other logic/rules apparently, since there was blood drawn and the original call was major, it can't be knocked down it's auto 5 and a game.
Stupid stuff.
No, Im hearing his career is in jeopardy, hes currently in hospital and very well could be on life support very soon...Was Josh back after this?
Injury to the head or face is only an automatic game misconduct if the penalty is deemed a major penalty.I believe in the case of boarding it would have been automatic either way. Injury to the face or head on a boarding call is an automatic game misconduct.
There goes any type of intent
One was clearly a penalty, and the other was a clean play.This gets five and a game but what happened to Knies gets nothing?
Of course, it nullifies intent, the guy is his best friend.I dont think being friends off the ice nullifies any intent.
There clearly wasnt any, it looked more like a light shove with Norris transfering his balance though.
Playing junior I fought my best friend who was playing on an opposing team.
One was clearly a penalty, and the other was a clean play.
Its pretty obvious.
Here we go, X happens 1 million times per game nothing to see move along.WTF is that BS.
that was a soft ass shove, Garland gets shoved harder than that 3-4 times a game.
The Hughes play was more damaging to the opponent? Why give and game when considering what happened to Knies?I dont think being friends off the ice nullifies any intent.
There clearly wasnt any, it looked more like a light shove with Norris transfering his balance though.
Playing junior I fought my best friend who was playing on an opposing team.
One was clearly a penalty, and the other was a clean play.
Its pretty obvious.
Check the jersey's.This gets five and a game but what happened to Knies gets nothing?
There is a no intent to injure, they were college teammates, but it’s still the right call by the rules.Of course, it nullifies intent, the guy is his best friend.
Why in the world would he try to hurt his best friend, makes no sense.
The league has serious issues when it comes to officiating. Clearly this okay is a two, but nothing more. The hit on Knies is so much worse. There’s obvious intent to hurt the opponent. Yet nothing.Check the jersey's.
I hope you’re being sarcastic. That was a nothing play. It happens a hundred times every game. He’ll, it happens every shift. It happens multiple times a shift. Guys check each other, along the wall, with cross checks to the hips all the time. Knies gets his head targeted and there’s nothing. Bad officiating.There is a no intent, they were college teammates, but it’s still the right call by the rules.
If they thought there was intent, then he’d be looking at a suspension.
Manage games.NHL refs are a joke lmao
Not enough people will admit this does in fact have a factor. The hit on Knies was significantly worse than this.Check the jersey's.
Knies call was called by the rule bookI hope you’re being sarcastic. That was a nothing play. It happens a hundred times every game. He’ll, it happens every shift. It happens multiple times a shift. Guys check each other, along the wall, with cross checks to the hips all the time. Knies gets his head targeted and there’s nothing. Bad officiating.