WiLBoY
Registered User
- Aug 29, 2009
- 569
- 464
Fans love to compare Hughes and Makar but both are extremely talented in their own way. Be happy the Canucks have one of them.
Fans love to compare Hughes and Makar but both are extremely talented in their own way. Be happy the Canucks have one of them.
Juvenile drivel.Do you know what the Smyth is? Makar was the best player on the team. He's the biggest reason they won a cup.
Yah it sucks that Hughes will never get that opportunity, but the NHL is a hard league to win.
Man this is a bad take. Cale is a stud, nobody denies that. The thing is this is the first year Quinn has had a Toews and no matter what you avs fans say because you guys seem obsessed with Quinn, it's a massive advantage Cale had. Nevermind the team as a whole."Generational" means once in a generation, and Cale Makar exists.
If Hughes wins a Norris, Smyth, and Stanley...he would be close to the same level as Makar.
Hughes has never even finished top 5 in Norris voting, despite the Canadian media bump.
Actually when the Avs had a bunch of injuries last year Cale most certainly struggled and avs fans said "well he's by himself" nevermind how he has looked without Toews. Quinn has had so much shit tossed his way in a crazy media market and has welcomed every ridiculous expectation and the first time we get the guy a legit top 4 partner along with stable coaching the kid shoots to an insane level on both sides of the puck while handling the captain role.This is one of biggest difference. 20-30 years later, it will become a norm for players to enter in the league later than ever before. which will be even more impressive when a player is able to enter in the NHL by Quinn and dominate at younger age than Makar ever did. Makar was blessed to play with top star on Avs team and he had a huge advantage to start his career with talents on the team than Quinn ever did. Quinn is already worth more than Makar now, to be honest. Avs fans will disagree. If the Canucks had Makar, I would think that he might struggle when the Canucks was so bad.
You cannot really compare apple to orange by saying that Makar is better than Quinn. They have their unique skill set that fit in Avs well. Keeping in mind that Avs forwards was already a star in this league before Makar ever arrived. Once they retire and no one to replace and if Makar continue to keep this up then I'd be more impresed. It remains to be seen if he could keep it up without those stars if Avs depth is depleted. It is coming and it's inevitable.
That's a nice fantasy but it isn't going to happen.I wonder if Dobson can snatch Norris from Hughes/Makar.
PPG+ and +21 on -23 Islanders team is crazy. He also has lower OISH than both Makar/Hughes so maybe he can at least stop losing ground in production going forward.
You have finally discovered a subject that Avs fans and Canucks fans can unite over. They should award you the Nobel peace prize.I wonder if Dobson can snatch Norris from Hughes/Makar.
PPG+ and +21 on -23 Islanders team is crazy. He also has lower OISH than both Makar/Hughes so maybe he can at least stop losing ground in production going forward.
Imagine still having this horrendous take on Hughes even in 2024. Take your own advice, you don't watch nor understand hockey by that bad take of yours.Hughes is doing great things this year on a stacked Canucks team but he will never be considered as good as Makar by anyone who actually watches and understand hockey. Makar is the total package, a true 2 way defenseman that is elite on both ends. Hughes is not.
No dman has the puck on more and the gap is massive, no dman has less turnovers and like Cale Quinn plays the hardest minutes. Quinn is +34, Cale is +12. Quinn is the most dynamic dman in hockey this season , he's also a year younger.Hughes is doing great things this year on a stacked Canucks team but he will never be considered as good as Makar by anyone who actually watches and understand hockey. Makar is the total package, a true 2 way defenseman that is elite on both ends. Hughes is not.
No Dman has less turnovers than Hughes? There’s actually only 22 Dman that have more giveaways than Hughes. If we just keep it to these 2 guys though, Hughes has 34 giveaways and Makar has 23. Flip side is Hughes has 26 takeaways, so -11 and Makar has 43, so +20.No dman has the puck on more and the gap is massive, no dman has less turnovers and like Cale Quinn plays the hardest minutes. Quinn is +34, Cale is +12. Quinn is the most dynamic dman in hockey this season , he's also a year younger.
No Dman has less turnovers than Hughes? There’s actually only 22 Dman that have more giveaways than Hughes. If we just keep it to these 2 guys though, Hughes has 34 giveaways and Makar has 23. Flip side is Hughes has 26 takeaways, so -11 and Makar has 43, so +20.
Not trying to use these stats to pump someone up though as I’m not a huge proponent of them, but unless I’m misunderstanding your comment, the facts are simply way off.
Show me the stats thenJust so you know. Turnovers and giveaways are not the same thing.
Show me the stats then
My point was, does the NHL actually track a turnover stat? Different from giveaways? Also, the notion that Hughes has the puck more than everyone else and the gap is huge. Not sure what backs that up as I’m not sure there is an actual stat that tracks that either….any stats out there on that are going to be questionable as it’s something that’s been looked at but not fully there yetI don't have the stats. Just pointed out your mixup.
Let’s save the banter for when these guys go head to head in a best on best tournament
Dear god, let’s not go thereI mean, did we not just see who won the skills the competition between the two?