Toggle sidebar

Provorov vs Chabot vs McAvoy vs Werenski

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates

Best player?

  • Total voters
    417
bert said:
Id imagine you have watched less than 5 sens games in your entire life based on your Chabot and Stone takes. Youve never watched a WJC game either.
Click to expand...
He's off on Chabot but you're wayyyyy off on Stone from your comments in the Couturier thread. You overrate the shit out of him.
 
Sasso09 said:
No he doesn't and no he didn't. ESP/60

Try again.

Werenski:
GP 11
G 2
A 3
P 5
ESP 4

Provorov:
GP 9
G 2
A 5
P 7
ESP 3

Provorov is uncharacteristically getting PP points so far but he's also played 2 less games. I expect him to finish with better ESP/60 like he has every year. not to mention the big gap between the two defensively.
Click to expand...

There isn't a big gap defensively, both are better than your Rielly type defender but neither are yet shutdown quality. McAvoy is closest to that quality of the 4. And here's the ESP/60 from last year. Werenski at 1.11 P/60 and Provorov at .85 P/60. I'm not even arguing for Werenski here, I'm saying you've exaggerated and misled in your case against him.
 
majormajor said:
There isn't a big gap defensively, both are better than your Rielly type defender but neither are yet shutdown quality. McAvoy is closest to that quality of the 4. And here's the ESP/60 from last year. Werenski at 1.11 P/60 and Provorov at .85 P/60. I'm not even arguing for Werenski here, I'm saying you've exaggerated and misled in your case against him.
Click to expand...
Werenski is nowhere near Provorov or McAvoy defensively, and Provorov is the best of the 3 in that regard.
 
Curious to see the same stats from the other three guys if someone more adroit would like to volunteer
 

Attachments

  • Provy.jpg
    Provy.jpg
    89.4 KB · Views: 4
I’d add McAvoy to the Leafs. If I was starting a team though I’d probably have to take any of the other 3 with Chabot as my top choice.
 
Tripod said:
Voted Chabot, but man Provorov has been good this year.
Click to expand...

Same for me.

If Provorov keeps up his play from the beginning of the season all year... he should be getting a top ~10 Norris finish.

Matching up vs top opponents and pretty consistently winning the match-up, while also producing at a great rate.
 
Amazing how different Provorov has been. Night and day from last year. Maybe the contract negotiations really were getting to him, but he's been legit a #1 this season.
 
NyQuil said:
Click to expand...

Any idea where they got those individual possession stats from? I've always wanted to know how long players have the puck and more importantly how much time they spend in each zone during the game.

Provorov just played 27:08 and 28:06 minutes in back to back nights. That's 55:14 of ice time in 27 hours and he still managed a 59.8% Corsi.
 
Now that we've hit the quarter pole here is some data to compare these four.

Most common partner:
Werenski - Jones
McAvoy - Chara
Provorov - Niskanen
Chabot - Zaitsev

Total TOI per game:
Chabot: 25.34 (21.22ES - 3:55PP - 0:15SH)
Provorov: 24.16 (19:15ES - 2:54PP - 2:06SH)
Werenski: 23.57 (18:29ES - 3:04PP - 2:22SH)
McAvoy: 22.22 (19:30ES - 1:10PP - 1:40SH)

Points:
Provorov: 13 points (5 at ES)
Chabot: 11 points (8 at ES)
Werenski: 10 points (7 at ES)
McAvoy: 6 points (5 at ES)

5v5 QualComp
McAvoy: 0.6551
Provorov: 0.3438
Werenski: 0.2247
Chabot -0.1282

5v5 OZ Starts
Provorov: 41.54
McAvoy: 46.39
Chabot: 50.00
Werenski: 57.81

5v5 CF%
Provorov: 53.60
McAvoy: 53.02
Werenski: 50.59
Chabot: 45.04

5v5 CF% Rel
Werenski: 2.20
Provorov: 1.92
McAvoy: 1.22
Chabot: -2.64

5v5 GF/60 to GA/60 differential
McAvoy: 1.117
Provorov: 0.198
Werenski: -0.386
Chabot: -0.699

5v5 GF/60 Rel to GA/60 Rel differential
Provorov: 0.78
McAvoy: 0.55
Werenski: -0.06
Chabot: -1.30

5v5 stats pulled from Dobber's Frozen Tools who uses the data from Natural Stattrick. Last updated 11/14/19.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Dumais, NotLeddy, alexgreeen and 3 others
Those stats don't paint a great picture for Chabot. Sheltered and still not great results.

I didn't realize he doesn't PK. 45% CF% is atrocious.
 
HyPnOtiK said:
Is McAvoy playing injured? I've watched him 3 or 4 times this year and he's looked really really off each time.
Click to expand...


No injury, he seems fine to me, advanced stats posted above match the eye test. Playing against the toughest competition, getting very little PP time or offensive zone starts.

Has only finished a minus in 3 games this year, should probably have a 2-3 goals but that's more of a product of some bad luck.

I think Provorov and McAvoy are clear #1 d-men, while Werenski and Chabot may put up more points but aren't as solid defensively.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pia8988
hubnester said:
Those stats don't paint a great picture for Chabot. Sheltered and still not great results.

I didn't realize he doesn't PK. 45% CF% is atrocious.
Click to expand...
When I first looked at the numbers I assumed it was just because Chabot was on a bad team and getting shelled by other teams top lines all game which Ottawa just can't keep up with. Then I realized that Borowiecki and DeMelo appear to play the toughest minutes but that's probably because Chabot plays teams top lines as well as getting him out there for 3rd and 4th line mismatches while Boro and DeMelo probably just play top 6 lines all game but with fewer minutes. I was surprised to see Chabot not only have a poor CF but also one of the worse CF Rel on the team.
 
StoneHands said:
When I first looked at the numbers I assumed it was just because Chabot was on a bad team and getting shelled by other teams top lines all game which Ottawa just can't keep up with. Then I realized that Borowiecki and DeMelo appear to play the toughest minutes but that's probably because Chabot plays teams top lines as well as getting him out there for 3rd and 4th line mismatches while Boro and DeMelo probably just play top 6 lines all game but with fewer minutes. I was surprised to see Chabot not only have a poor CF but also one of the worse CF Rel on the team.
Click to expand...

Advanced stats never tell the full story. If you were to sit there and tell me Boro and DeMelo are better d-men, you'd be nuts. Similar story in Toronto where Cody Ceci is the advanced stats darling relative to his peers, and yet every Toronto highlight has a Ceci defensive gaffe lol.

The reality is, Chabot doesn't have a lot of good options up front to work with. Compare his numbers last year to this year
 
Emerz said:
No injury, he seems fine to me, advanced stats posted above match the eye test. Playing against the toughest competition, getting very little PP time or offensive zone starts.

Has only finished a minus in 3 games this year, should probably have a 2-3 goals but that's more of a product of some bad luck.

I think Provorov and McAvoy are clear #1 d-men, while Werenski and Chabot may put up more points but aren't as solid defensively.
Click to expand...
Toughest competition but he's facing that with very competent/great line mates. I haven't watched enough of him this year to have an overly strong opinion but i am shocked at the little offense he's producing on that stacked team.
 
Sasso09 said:
Toughest competition but he's facing that with very competent/great line mates. I haven't watched enough of him this year to have an overly strong opinion but i am shocked at the little offense he's producing on that stacked team.
Click to expand...

The Bergeron line at even strength doesn’t really utilize the defence as part of their cycling in the offensive zone and he doesn’t get any PP time with them, so that’s kind of why.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom