Maple Leaf
VIP
- Sep 18, 2009
- 10,225
- 5,471
Doesn't matter how you tell teh story the fact of the matter is:
2 years of JT contract are done' with 5 more to go. I expect JT to not accomplish much in the last 3 yrs of his contract.
So 2 yrs of JT is ruined by abysmal management of the roster with AHL level D-men playing, hoping Freddy to play like prime hasek and expecting miracles on ice.
When babcock had said there will be pain; I did not expect this!
This is self inflicted pain
The only real complaint one could have with JT is that he can't validate $11 mil salary as he isn't one of the top 5 players in the game and never will be so his cap hit >>> his contribution.
His signing cost the Leafs their 1st round pick 13th overall as it triggered the need to free cap space for others, but trading Kapanen has returned that pick for now anyways.
His contract acted as a magnet that drew other players up to his so now we have 3 X $11 mil players as a result as JT contract off the ice and his impact on inflating Marner's stats resulted in a vast overpayment for Mitch where he should have been an $8-$8.5 mil player and not $11 mil.
If Matthews was at $11.5 mil X 8 and JT was $9.5 mil X 7 and Marner was at $8.5 mil X 8 the Leafs wouldn't find themselves in Cap Hell and now struggling to qualify for the playoffs. IMO
Remember folks. The same ppl who hate everything the Leafs do are the same ppl who hated on the Raps. The same people who hated the Derozan/Kawhi deal and were the same people celebrating when the Raps won. They play both sides of the fence so pay them no mind.
How about Tavares signed for free, Kadri still the 3rd line center, and Marner shipped out for assets or defensive help. There is no conceivable possible scenario where adding a franchise centre isn't the best possible move. Like ever.
That's where it's tough. While you're right you'd be crazy not to add a franchise C for only $$$, like LeBron said, w"too heavy as ****". With the amount of money we're paying up front we've become a one trick pony. Unfortunately, we've seen now that one trick pony can be shut down. I would much rather have a franchise D or a couple of really good D men than JT right now. But like I said, your right because you can't guarantee that you'll be able to sign a franchise D through FA. So you take what you can I guess.
Tavares does come in two and a half million dollars cheaper then Patrice Bergeron and David Pastrnak combined.
And I'm sure that'll look even better a few years from now.
One of the worst things I have ever read on these boards, and that's saying something.
I've actually started and backspaced this response so many times because I didn't know where to start.
You associate Tavares having the lowest on-ice save percentage among Leafs forwards with him having defensive deficiencies... yet you neglect to reference the disparity between his actual and expected GF% or acknowledge how faulty it is to blame one player for how his goaltender performed. This is plus/minus level analysis.
You use Totals stats instead of Rates stats.
You then assume the mantle of expert body language analyst by saying he was looking at the ground too much in post-elimination interviews.
Then you make some sort of asinine comparison between Tavares and Jake Gardiner, in some ill-conceived attempt to say they are too offense-first, based on your wrong and incomplete interpretation of team save percentage.
And your suggestion to fix things is to put Nylander (hahahaha of COURSE it's Nylander), a 30-goal, 70-point scorer on the third line so you can put some defensively responsible wingers on Tavares' wings, to fix these non-existent defensive issues?
I'm just speechless.
Tavares does come in two and a half million dollars cheaper then Patrice Bergeron and David Pastrnak combined.
And I'm sure that'll look even better a few years from now.
I get according to you and others it's all Tavares's fault Islanders weren't winning and now they are winning since he isn't there, but thats just wrong.Didn't like the Taveras signing at the time. Reason being he has average speed at best. The game is getting quicker and the new players coming in our faster. He will have a harder time keeping up with still 5 years left on his contract. Tough contract to get out of, I think the cap will be flat for at least 3 to 4 years, due to the pandemic, not 2 years as being reported, That contract will be a burden as the years move on. I dont know if its been mentioned, series wins since the Tavares signing,
Toronto 0
Islanders 4
Hilarious stuff. Just look at the post above yours saying the contract will be a burdenStopped reading at
“Tavares is a decent offensive player”
Ya okay buddy![]()
PPG with a broken finger. Let's not forget that. It's a tough injury.Tavares was a bust this season when looking at production vs 11 mil cap hit. I don’t understand ppl defending it and saying “he was still almost ppg!
Almost ppg is garbage and not good enough for an 11 mil cap hit. He did have a solid play in round but still missed glaring chances that need to be converted at crucial times.
He absolutely needs to be better otherwise this contract is an anchor by year 3 only... and there’s 5 years left on the deal.
The problem with Tavares is that for the $11M you're getting a goal consistent scorer who because of his skating deficiencies and lack of intensity cannot raise the level of his game in the playoffs as evidenced with his 0.11 Pts/G drop over his career in the post season.
Didn't see Panarin play centre to my knowledge.Here's a little John Tavares test:
Entering next season, assuming we have a normal 82 game season, 1) how confident are you in John Tavares to score around 40 goals and 85+ points 2) do you think he will outproduce Artemi Panarin or 3) are you preparing a lengthy response outlining how the above criteria is unfair?
Panarin - career high of 87 points, then signs for $11.643 million.Here's a little John Tavares test:
Entering next season, assuming we have a normal 82 game season, 1) how confident are you in John Tavares to score around 40 goals and 85+ points 2) do you think he will outproduce Artemi Panarin or 3) are you preparing a lengthy response outlining how the above criteria is unfair?
Didn't see Panarin play centre to my knowledge.
85 points is fine by me, and I think it's entirely probable if he doesn't break a finger and then have to play through that.
Panarin - career high of 87 points, then signs for $11.643 million.
Tavares - career high of 86 points, then signs for $11 million.
Marner - career high of 94 points, then signs for 10.893 million.
Just for context. 2 contracts have been judged by many as brutal, and then there is Panarin's steal of a contract.