Problems With This Team

  • Thread starter Thread starter BarbaraAlphanse
  • Start date Start date
  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates

BarbaraAlphanse

Guest
Haven't seen a thread about this. Every thread seems to touch upon this at one point or another. Let's see what everyone thinks the problems of this team are.

For me, there are several.

First and foremost, talent aside, this team does not hold the concept of camaraderie. Hockey is a team sport, and that escapes this particular group of guys.

Mentality - this group lacks resilience. There is no urgency for this team to win games. There is no accountability. No motivation to play above average. It's a shame. There is a certain prestige to playing as a professional athlete... let alone as one for one of the most historic teams in NY. Where is the will to win in every game? Is there no sense of representation in these players for a city that's supposed to characterize greatness? This group of guys is mentally soft. You can't be a successful team without resilience. Every elite team, every elite athlete, has this common denominator - mental fortitude.

Physicality - this group lacks grit, lacks toughness. There's a thread about this. It's not a coincidence i'm mentioning it here. It's not about adding the Brashears and the Orr's of the world to mindlessly fight another team's goon. No. This is about defending your manhood. If someone disrespects you, if someone takes liberties with you or one of your team mates (especially in a manner that compromises safety and health), where is the response? I'm not saying this was the right thing to do, but Erikson is no where near the player to the Bruins that Nash is to the Rangers, and Thornton brutally assaulted the guy responsible. You think that doesn't send a message to the rest of his team mates? Thornton is about to be suspended for games, likely without pay. His name will be dirtied league wide. Yet this is the direct type of action that brings a locker room together. Brings guys together. Makes everyone fight for each other, rather than just for themselves.

Alain Vigneault - I know Tortorella wasn't going to lead us to the promise land. He alienated his players, was stubborn to the point that it did his team harm, and was incapable of understanding the sport of hockey with how it is meant to be played. But AV isn't going to lead us there either. This is NYC. There is a personality to this city... a gritty, tough, and irrepressible character. There needs to be the recognition by this coach that this ever present personality needs to be represented by the team he sends out there. AV is emotionless. He's passive. He's not the coach we need, as a city, and as a team, to succeed.

Michael Del Zotto - For all of his faults as a player, this is not a complaint about him. This is a complaint about how management has managed to take focus away from winning, away from the players to succeed (which should be primary) with this media distraction. Every day everyone talks about Del Zotto and where he should go, when he should go, how terrible of a fit he is, etc. I'm sure this chatter and sentiment trickles down to the players. It serves as a distraction. It unfocuses the players from what should be their primary objective - win. This isn't how first class organizations should act. Either trade the guy or force the coach to give him permanent playing time. Vigneault is essentially becoming Tortorella part 2. He's becoming bigger than the team by continuing to jerk our players around with their place in the lineup. You can't have that.

Finally, talent and construction of the team - This is an unbalanced team. It is not in need of a full overhaul, but there need to be changes. There need to be more players with mental toughness. There needs to be an even distribution of talent and complementary skill on every line. The blame falls on the GM in this regard. In terms of players that exemplify a certain strong mentality.... Sather eradicated this team from the only players that cared. They may not have been the most talented players but they held this team together fundamentally. Prust, Rupp, Fedotenko, Dubinsky... these players cared about the well being of the team and their fellow team mates. We are devoid of that character trait now. How about depth and balance? Pyatt? Pouloit? Dumpster diving for a franchise with endless capital and resources? Unacceptable. This is a failure of the GM to assemble a balanced team with a winning attitude.

I'm tired of the self-pitying I see from fans and this team with the results we're seeing from this year's Rangers team. Good teams find a way to overcome adversity. Refereeing may not help this team's causes, unlucky bounces may be the final nail in the coffin in some games, whatever other excuses you can think of... but this team has already decided to have a losing mentality. Don't expect much out of this team until that changes.
 
Any conversation short of the construct of this team and the brain trust who constructed it is merely window dressing. The problems are clear.
 
My dad told me years ago that this team wouldn't be worth watching until Sather was fired or dead. Unfortunately 13 years later it looks like he's right.
 
Any conversation short of the construct of this team and the brain trust who constructed it is merely window dressing. The problems are clear.

/endthread

For the past 13 years we've been saying the same thing about mediocrity. There has been one constant over that period of time. Sather.
 
Sather dismantled a team that was 1st in the conference and reached the ECF, and then, instead of recognizing issues with the personnel and realizing their limitations, proceeded to hire a new coach in the hopes that he would "unleash" the offense.

Now not only do we have a team that can't score, but they have lost their identity, compete level, and can no longer defend like they used to. Well-done Sather, not many GMs can accomplish that in a span of less than two years.
 
Getting past sather because he is clearly not going anywhere, these group of players should be ashamed.

They pouted and got the previous coach fired, now the onus is on them and to turn in a performance like they have so far, they should be held accountable like they made their prior coach accountable. They have become to comfortable or to entitled during their stay here. Management and the GM has bent to the "cores" every whim, and one of these guys needs to be made an example of.
 
Sather dismantled a team that was 1st in the conference and reached the ECF, and then, instead of recognizing issues with the personnel and realizing their limitations, proceeded to hire a new coach in the hopes that he would "unleash" the offense.

Now not only do we have a team that can't score, but they have lost their identity, compete level, and can no longer defend like they used to. Well-done Sather, not many GMs can accomplish that in a span of less than two years.

Agree with this post 100%. My other problem is that we can blame Sather all we want, but everything that you mentioned in your post were things that our fanbase was clamoring for.

We lost in the 2012 ECF, everyone and their mother wanted to trade for Nash to get more offense. And everyone thought Dubinsky was replaceable because he had one bad offensive year. Then, we underperform for most of 2012-13 after replacing Prust, Dubinsky, Fedotenko, etc. with Pyatt, Halpern, Asham, and everyone wants Torts gone because he's holding back our offense. So we fire Torts, and now everyone is saying that the team is poorly constructed and Sather should have known that replacing the coach wouldn't do anything.
 
Agree with this post 100%. My other problem is that we can blame Sather all we want, but everything that you mentioned in your post were things that our fanbase was clamoring for.

We lost in the 2012 ECF, everyone and their mother wanted to trade for Nash to get more offense. And everyone thought Dubinsky was replaceable because he had one bad offensive year. Then, we underperform for most of 2012-13 after replacing Prust, Dubinsky, Fedotenko, etc. with Pyatt, Halpern, Asham, and everyone wants Torts gone because he's holding back our offense. So we fire Torts, and now everyone is saying that the team is poorly constructed and Sather should have known that replacing the coach wouldn't do anything.

I think the Nash trade is the biggest fallacy around here. It had nothing to do with 40 G 80 pt Gaborik disappearing. It had nothing to do with 90 pt PPQB Richards turning into a legendary failure. It had nothing to do with Sauer's career ending and nothing to do with an errant puck degrading Staal to mush. It didn't kill Cherepanov or cause Boog's OD, it didn't demand Korpikoski's trade, it didn't stall Grachev's development.It didn't sign Gomez, redden and Drury to awful ill-advised contracts. Sather and a mix of horrific, literally tragic luck

I actually feel sad now. 3 career's lost, 2 LIVES lost and a bunch of other talents just disappearing.
 
I think the Nash trade is the biggest fallacy around here. It had nothing to do with 40 G 80 pt Gaborik disappearing. It had nothing to do with 90 pt PPQB Richards turning into a legendary failure. It had nothing to do with Sauer's career ending and nothing to do with an errant puck degrading Staal to mush

Sauer's career ended towards the beginning of 2011-12, and the team still did well. For sure, it's a major loss...I thought Sauer was one of the most defensively sound Rangers defensmen I've seen in the last 20 years. But his absence was a consistent for the 2011-12 and 2012-13 teams.

And I absolutely agree with you that Gaborik disappearing and Richards struggling were major factors. But I also believe that Sather and most of our fanbase underestimated how important Dubinsky and Prust were to our team's heart and soul, and overestimated how good Nash would be with us.

How many times did we hear "Nash is a 35-40 goals scorer with a crappy team like CBS? He'll definitely score 40-45 in NY!!!"
 
Have No Fear...The Rangers are fine...maybe attempt to change 1 or 2 guys but the season has a long way to go....and the Rangers will rise and conquest...LGR!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
They really need someone like Torts to put the fear of god into them. AV dont strike me as that type of intense personality
 
Agree with this post 100%. My other problem is that we can blame Sather all we want, but everything that you mentioned in your post were things that our fanbase was clamoring for.

We lost in the 2012 ECF, everyone and their mother wanted to trade for Nash to get more offense. And everyone thought Dubinsky was replaceable because he had one bad offensive year. Then, we underperform for most of 2012-13 after replacing Prust, Dubinsky, Fedotenko, etc. with Pyatt, Halpern, Asham, and everyone wants Torts gone because he's holding back our offense. So we fire Torts, and now everyone is saying that the team is poorly constructed and Sather should have known that replacing the coach wouldn't do anything.

THIS TIMES 1000..
Everyone can cry all they want but we get what we want then some of you clowns say they want something else. It's the GM, I believe Gaborik needed to be traded I like what we got for him I don't like what we gave up for Nash. All say this over and over Nash is nhls Carmelo Anthony. They'll never be winners just all stars. Guys like pouliot,pyatt,Boyle,dorsett,and everyone else we throw in there is replaceable and they're useless.. I don't complain about this team anymore because it's Sather and will always be Sather
 
there's literally nothing about this team to be happy or excited about, Callahan has been ****, havent noticed hagelin in 10+ games now is he still injured? Girardi looks absolutly lost and hes getting PP time to boot, and Moore doesn't look like hes even capable of playing at this level. WHAT THE ****
 
I think the Nash trade is the biggest fallacy around here. It had nothing to do with 40 G 80 pt Gaborik disappearing. It had nothing to do with 90 pt PPQB Richards turning into a legendary failure. It had nothing to do with Sauer's career ending and nothing to do with an errant puck degrading Staal to mush. It didn't kill Cherepanov, it didn't demand Korpikoski's trade, it didn't stall Grachev's development.It didn't sign Gomez, redden and Drury to awful ill-advised contracts. Sather and a mix of horrific, literally tragic luck

This.


I keep saying it, but what gets me the most is that this team just has NO compete and no second gear. They get a lead, they sit back, coast, make dumb mistakes, and let the team get back in the game. There's no kill.

They go behind? Then they try to play more defensively and, somehow, make more dumb mistakes. Hank's playing like crap. This team. I don't know.

There's no compete, and there's no drive. Nash tried to make a push to get some energy. That's about it. It's just ridiculous.
 
The biggest problem is the core not playing the way that got them into the league. Add to that incompetent stopgaps and a team with a personality that screams meh, we get a completely mediocre team. Too much talent to rebuild, not enough to win.
 
Literally the only positives of this year or McDonagh, Kreider, and Zucc.
 
Do people honestly think the ECF team would've done just as we'll the next year? Everything went right that year they wouldn't of had a repeat performance in 2012/2013.

And 99% of NYR fans were for the Nash trade. Hindsight is 20/20.

People also foolishly thought Kreider would continue to crush after his 1st playoffs. That made Dubinsky expendable in Sathers eyes. Now it wasn't a good decision but most people thought it was back then.

Don't get me wrong, I hate Sather but this is blind hatred at its worst.
 
Sauer's career ended towards the beginning of 2011-12, and the team still did well. For sure, it's a major loss...I thought Sauer was one of the most defensively sound Rangers defensmen I've seen in the last 20 years. But his absence was a consistent for the 2011-12 and 2012-13 teams.

And I absolutely agree with you that Gaborik disappearing and Richards struggling were major factors. But I also believe that Sather and most of our fanbase underestimated how important Dubinsky and Prust were to our team's heart and soul, and overestimated how good Nash would be with us.

How many times did we hear "Nash is a 35-40 goals scorer with a crappy team like CBS? He'll definitely score 40-45 in NY!!!"

Sauer's injury is extremely important. The team pulling together for the 11 season is ok but it leaves a gaping hole we have yet to fill. It has to b mentioned as having a big influence.

Those 40-45 prognosticator's were crazy but they also were thinking we'd have Gabs and Richards. both guys literally had multiple 80+ point seasons. They both were almost non existent or detrimental and it had nothing to do with Dubs, prust or Anisimov leaving. For gods sake Gabs carried the team playing with Eric Christensen and Richards was a 90pt guy who QB'd PP his whole career. He wasn't even a hockey player last year

I think the Nash trade only made the team better. It's all that other stuff that killed the team with those top 2 talents absolutely being THE main culprit. If I raise my hand and a bomb goes off I don't blame my raising my hand for bomb's going off. Similarly I don't blame trading for Nash for Gabs and Richards turning into two duds last year
 
Do people honestly think the ECF team would've done just as we'll the next year? Everything went right that year they wouldn't of had a repeat performance in 2012/2013.

And 99% of NYR fans were for the Nash trade. Hindsight is 20/20.

People also foolishly thought Kreider would continue to crush after his 1st playoffs. That made Dubinsky expendable in Sathers eyes. Now it wasn't a good decision but most people thought it was back then.

Don't get me wrong, I hate Sather but this is blind hatred at its worst.

People act like the ECF were world beaters. We got taken to the 7th game by two teams who were "worse" then us. Not to metion even if we did make it past the devils we would have been destroyed by the kings.

I know we've had one cup in 74 years but just because that team had a bit of success let's not over hype what they actually accomplished.
 
Do people honestly think the ECF team would've done just as we'll the next year? Everything went right that year they wouldn't of had a repeat performance in 2012/2013.

And 99% of NYR fans were for the Nash trade. Hindsight is 20/20.

People also foolishly thought Kreider would continue to crush after his 1st playoffs. That made Dubinsky expendable in Sathers eyes. Now it wasn't a good decision but most people thought it was back then.

Don't get me wrong, I hate Sather but this is blind hatred at its worst.

I think that ECF team would've at least had more fight in them. If this team was playing and things were just not working out, that's one thing. When they roll over and die in back to back home games, that's extremely problematic.

I'm not trying to blindly hate on Slats or anyone in particular. There's just been multiple mistakes/misjudgments, and now we have to accept the results and figure things out.
 
I think the Nash trade is the biggest fallacy around here. It had nothing to do with 40 G 80 pt Gaborik disappearing. It had nothing to do with 90 pt PPQB Richards turning into a legendary failure. It had nothing to do with Sauer's career ending and nothing to do with an errant puck degrading Staal to mush. It didn't kill Cherepanov or cause Boog's OD, it didn't demand Korpikoski's trade, it didn't stall Grachev's development.It didn't sign Gomez, redden and Drury to awful ill-advised contracts. Sather and a mix of horrific, literally tragic luck

I actually feel sad now. 3 career's lost, 2 LIVES lost and a bunch of other talents just disappearing.

Everyone thought the "curse" died in '94.

Things that have happened since then make what happened from 1941-1994 look minor. And it's not all Sather.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad