First round opponent will likely be the Devils. Don't count on them being an easy out. Or any other team for that matter - the East is an abbatoir this season.Speaking of playoffs -
Can they dispatch their first round opponent quickly? Four or five games? Or will they go seven cause Rangers?
Speaking of playoffs -
Can they dispatch their first round opponent quickly? Four or five games? Or will they go seven cause Rangers?
That really helped Colorado, especially against Tampa.Speaking of playoffs -
Can they dispatch their first round opponent quickly? Four or five games? Or will they go seven cause Rangers?
He's climbing the top Rangers centers of all time list.Speaking of Ryan Callahan, here's another one for the "time gets weird once you're past 25" file.
Mika Zibanejad has played more games as a Ranger than Ryan Callahan did.
That really helped Colorado, especially against Tampa.
Yes, it also helped that they were and continue to be in a horrible conference full of teams that would be lucky to be the WC2 in the East.That really helped Colorado, especially against Tampa.
we're close... Kid line still isn't there and Lindgren - Fox...
Hopefully this is the new normal.
Big whoop. Canes owned us in the regular season last year
First round opponent will likely be the Devils. Don't count on them being an easy out. Or any other team for that matter - the East is an abbatoir this season.
We did beat the Canes in the regular season last year, though. In Carolina.
but the team scored at an absurd rate with them on the ice, and moreover, they were driving xGF better than every line... I get you broader point about whether the line actually works, and the large body of work suggests 'kind of' at best, but they definitely did everything you say they didn't do in that playoff run. They controlled play, they dominated goal differential, and they did so primarily by driving actual goals better than any other line combo by a significant margin--which, given the larger body of work for that line, was precisely 'a huge elevation over their typical play.'I don't think the kids were bad in the playoffs. I think they were a solid forechecking line that didn't score enough. That's what they always are as players and as a line. I reject the notion that it was some kind of huge elevation over their typical play.
With the other good lines we have this year, it shouldn't be a problem. We have 12 games left. We'll certainly lose and probably not look good a couple of times. When that happens, Gallant has to put his big boy pants on and not go back to the bullshit lines he feels safe with because he came up with them. You're a professional coach. Stop overreacting to losses. We've scored like 300 goals and given up four since he flipped Panarin and Kreider. These are the lines we should be playing.
Another problem last year (and another bit of good news) was Kevin Rooney. Right as we were losing momentum against Tampa and couldn't make a mistake, that's when Sniffus Erectus decided to put in a guy that makes a mistake every time he touches the puck. The good news is, I don't think the temptation is there this year of a "reliable vet" that he's going to feel an itch to put in. Lewhatshisface is not that.
If he sticks with these lines, we'll be a lot better in the playoffs than we were last year.
With Svech out for the year, I can't see the Devils NOT passing the Canes. So, I'm thinking it is more likely the Canes.
This is exactly why I’m eager to see how we do tomorrow/Thursday. They’re both huge measuring stick games for this squad, and they need to show they can play a similar style against a tougher opponent.With Svech out for the year, I can't see the Devils NOT passing the Canes. So, I'm thinking it is more likely the Canes.
The Rangers got to the conference finals that year with a record of 8-1. It felt to everyone like they finally were going to be able to do it. The Devils were a pain in the ass, as was Kirk McLean...Rangers also did it to open the playoffs in '94 against the Isles.
This is exactly why I’m eager to see how we do tomorrow/Thursday. They’re both huge measuring stick games for this squad, and they need to show they can play a similar style against a tougher opponent.
Huh? Yeah it would have been 7-1. Bail them out... lol. I'm convinced that many of you are waiting for the Rangers team that will never exist in reality.Could of been a very different game if Halak didn't bail them out early in the 1st.
Halak.
Halak.
Miller.
Pitt looks like a mess. Their goaltending is falling apart and they look in disarray. I think a big part of that is they couldn't adjust to the puck tempo we played with. Regardless it is always fun to beat pittCan I take something from them beating Pitt 6-0 the night before?
Deservedly so. Despite the influx of Panarin, Kane, Tank, growth of the kids, Shesterkin, Fox, etc, he’s still the best player on the team.He's climbing the top Rangers centers of all time list.
Beating them would really help us in the long run. They are a very good team but I would much rather face them in the 1st round than the Devils. We can beat anybody but it's just a better matchup for the Rangers facing Carolina.The next 2 games are a measuring stick for Carolina, not us. We've already handily beaten them twice pre-deadline and just did a Harlem Globetrotters impression on 2 teams "allegedly" in the playoff race, over the weekend. Show us what you got Candy Canes because right now they are looking like lunch.