GDT: Preseason games 2024-25

Raccoon Jesus

We were right there
Oct 30, 2008
63,318
66,078
I.E.
Anyone else impressed with Greentree? He plays a mature game for his age. He is not far from making it.
Lee and Helenius are also closer than I thought.
Portillo and Pinelli have improved since last year and are on track for the following wave.


Anyone notice Helenius challenge Ian Cole after his second big hit. Cole ran to the bench lol.

Didnt' see that specifically but i LOVED that no one would be intimidated/back down. Was a nice change in attitude, especially with some of the Utah folks running around, like Crouse and Groundskeeper Willie.
 

Schmooley

Registered User
Apr 5, 2016
3,275
4,124



Didnt' see that specifically but i LOVED that no one would be intimidated/back down. Was a nice change in attitude, especially with some of the Utah folks running around, like Crouse and Groundskeeper Willie.
Those are good numbers for a kid playing against pros for the first time. Hes not a project that needs 3 years for his all around game and physical strength to catch up to his skill in order to make it. Very much a guy that will go out there on any line and complete the assignments the coach gives him so they can win games.
I like this player. The Kings are lacking high upside pure goal scorers in the system though.
 

Kurrilino

Go Stoll Go
Aug 6, 2005
8,833
2,208
Calgary
He continues to just be large. He's not mobile, not fast, not really even athletic. He's just big and that's it. His lack of lateral movement would get badly exposed in an NHL regular season.
Vasilevsky made a decent career out of that.
It's enough to butterfly and slightly move to the left or right and you are good.
I see Portillo being NHL ready from next year on
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tube Skates

theMajor

Registered User
Feb 9, 2012
4,495
988
Socal
I don’t know what it is, but I am not overly impressed when I see Clarke. I know it’s not fair to gauge him by rookie doughty who was sensational. But he’s just far from that so I’m just not hyped. I don’t even think he’s at Voynovs level.

I am aware it’s preseason. Just rare that I get impressed with Clarke. That one breakaway goal he scored last year was the only impressive thing I remember.
hes got a great mind for the game and fantastic vision, he just needs more NHL experience. still looks a little too timid for the big league but im confident he will get there in another season or two
 

Lt Dan

F*** your ice cream!
Sep 13, 2018
12,082
20,508
Bayou La Batre
youtu.be
I think Turcotte and Thomas looked really good. NHL ready. I don’t know what it is, but I am not overly impressed when I see Clarke. I know it’s not fair to gauge him by rookie doughty who was sensational. But he’s just far from that so I’m just not hyped. I don’t even think he’s at Voynovs level.

I am aware it’s preseason. Just rare that I get impressed with Clarke. That one breakaway goal he scored last year was the only impressive thing I remember.
I think a lot of people forget how long Voynov was in the A

1727212718372.png
 

Surf Nutz

Hockey Remote Viewer With A Frozen Finger
May 16, 2022
2,840
995
In the tube
clubnami.com
When you're on the wing, you're kind of stuck on the wall and then when you have an opportunity to build speed into the attack, you're coming across the ice. In the middle of the ice, you can drive plays. You can get the puck on your stick in the middle and kick it wide and drive the net. With a big body QB can do things that others can't.

Lfg QB!
 

DoktorJeep

Fair winds and following seas Nikolai.
Aug 2, 2005
6,775
6,145
OC
I understand your point. My opinion is based upon the place where the player is drafted. If he was drafted in the same spot Voynov was, then I wouldn’t care if he was a dud.
At this point, Spence is closer to Voynov and Clarke to Jack Johnson, minus getting blown up by Jan Bulis.
 

Sol

Smile
Jun 30, 2017
24,401
20,524
At this point, Spence is closer to Voynov and Clarke to Jack Johnson, minus getting blown up by Jan Bulis.
I’m not sure what’s going to happen but it’s kinda disappointing that with all the hype and his draft position that he’s kinda unimpressive as a whole.

But that’s Kings development for you.
 

tigermask48

Maniacal Laugh
Mar 10, 2004
3,937
1,328
R'Lyeh, Antarctica
Vasilevsky made a decent career out of that.
It's enough to butterfly and slightly move to the left or right and you are good.
I see Portillo being NHL ready from next year on
Vasilevsky had the athleticism to sprawl and make saves he shouldn't though. Portillo hasn't shown any of that. Watch the two goals from the Utah game. The first one, he just gets stuck in place trying to move laterally to make the save. The second he goes down, has no idea where the rebound is and makes has no chance to make the save because he lost the puck.

When Portillo starts making saves like this:



Then we can talk about the Vasilevsky comparison. Because I don't see it at all right now.
 

King'sPawn

Enjoy the chaos
Jul 1, 2003
22,871
23,396
Jordan Spence
- had 8 points in his first 24 games, when he was 20-21 years old.
- averaged 1:42 on the powerplay and 19:45 his first 24 games
- He's the next Voynov... after being called Paul LaDue by multiple posters as recently as last season

Clarke
- has 8 points in his first 25 games split between two seasons during his ages of 19-21,
- averaged 1:09 on the powerplay and 13:39 total his first 25
- he's the next Johnson and don't see anything special.

As for not seeing anything special - I don't know what to tell you. He's not a human highlight reel, and he's learning to play a more mature game (something Spence definitely has on him). But he makes subtle moves with the puck, both on retrieval and distribution, that Spence lacks.

They're both very different players, and I'm happy to have both. But both came in completely different situations and had differing responsibilities.

I mean, let's look at his most recent goal:


1. Presence of mind to jump on the attack, knowing he had support
2. Not panicking or going for "just a tip" with a hard pass coming his way
3. Deking with control of the puck right after the hard pass to beat the goalie

That's tremendous presence of mind of the entire situation around him.

And there's this pass from him leading to Lizotte's goal:


Didn't lead to a goal but it shows the Doughty-like elusiveness back when he was younger:


So, yeah. Don't know what you're looking for from a 20-21 year-old defenseman, but this kid has exceptional awareness to be a consistent threat as he continues to mature.
 

Statto

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 9, 2014
5,685
8,034
Jordan Spence
- had 8 points in his first 24 games, when he was 20-21 years old.
- averaged 1:42 on the powerplay and 19:45 his first 24 games
- He's the next Voynov... after being called Paul LaDue by multiple posters as recently as last season

Clarke
- has 8 points in his first 25 games split between two seasons during his ages of 19-21,
- averaged 1:09 on the powerplay and 13:39 total his first 25
- he's the next Johnson and don't see anything special.

As for not seeing anything special - I don't know what to tell you. He's not a human highlight reel, and he's learning to play a more mature game (something Spence definitely has on him). But he makes subtle moves with the puck, both on retrieval and distribution, that Spence lacks.

They're both very different players, and I'm happy to have both. But both came in completely different situations and had differing responsibilities.

I mean, let's look at his most recent goal:


1. Presence of mind to jump on the attack, knowing he had support
2. Not panicking or going for "just a tip" with a hard pass coming his way
3. Deking with control of the puck right after the hard pass to beat the goalie

That's tremendous presence of mind of the entire situation around him.

And there's this pass from him leading to Lizotte's goal:


Didn't lead to a goal but it shows the Doughty-like elusiveness back when he was younger:


So, yeah. Don't know what you're looking for from a 20-21 year-old defenseman, but this kid has exceptional awareness to be a consistent threat as he continues to mature.

That goal ‘really’ makes me think of Jack Johnson.

I do think everyone is seriously over thinking the first pre-season game. It carries very little weight, positive or negative, for the guys expected to make the NHL roster. It’s simply a case of getting reps, for fitness and the new systems, at this point. By games 5 & 6 it’ll warrant some analysis.
 
Last edited:

NikF

Registered User
Sep 24, 2006
3,017
501
The point is if you rebuild you need one of your high picks to be Doughty, Makar, Stamkos, Hedman, Heiskanen, Barkov etc. level of player or you're not going to win. Faber-Clarke-Byfield would have been a solid start to a new core that could realistically win down the line and could probably use another top 5 pick to supplement. But alas i don't know if Faber didn't want to sign. At this point it's hard seeing the Kings as a realistic contender now or in future, looks very much like a Minnesota Wild/Nashville Predators trajectory ie a decent playoff team true contenders will beat in first or second round. But maybe that's enough for Luc, everyone keeps their gigs and they can daydream about getting lucky one year.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Schrute farms

King'sPawn

Enjoy the chaos
Jul 1, 2003
22,871
23,396
That goal ‘really’ makes me think of Jack Johnson.

I do think everyone is seriously over thinking the first pre-season game. It carries very little weight, positive or negative, for the guys expected to make the NHL roster. It’s simply a case of getting reps, for fitness and the new systems, at this point. By games 5 & 6 it’ll warrant some analysis.
Maybe it's my age, but I thought Johnson would just crank it from the point. I don't remember any goals scored like that. Also remember him being more physical than Clarke.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tigermask48

Sol

Smile
Jun 30, 2017
24,401
20,524
The point is if you rebuild you need one of your high picks to be Doughty, Makar, Stamkos, Hedman, Heiskanen, Barkov etc. level of player or you're not going to win. Faber-Clarke-Byfield would have been a solid start to a new core that could realistically win down the line and could probably use another top 5 pick to supplement. But alas i don't know if Faber didn't want to sign. At this point it's hard seeing the Kings as a realistic contender now or in future, looks very much like a Minnesota Wild/Nashville Predators trajectory ie a decent playoff team true contenders will beat in first or second round. But maybe that's enough for Luc, everyone keeps their gigs and they can daydream about getting lucky one year.
Byfield and Clarke are far from being Doughty,Makar,Stamkos, and Barkov.

I think the biggest issue with the draft is that we never got the bonafide stars that we needed. Byfield is good, Clarke is not anywhere close to Doughty.

In order for the Kings to be contenders they’re gonna have to source that bonafide player through another draft or trade. These guys just simply aren’t that guy.

I think any honest person looks at how f***ing good Kopitar and Doughty were in their rookie year can see how far these guys are from that level.

I think the real star we lost potentially is Vilardi that we got rid of with one of the worst trades of all time.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad