King'sPawn
Enjoy the chaos
- Jul 1, 2003
- 23,144
- 23,995
And I genuinely appreciate you coming here to clear the air. By you coming on here, surely you know why it was offputting.I'm not sure how many people knew why the cartoons were airing.
I did.
Again... it's an issue with communication and that could have been handled better.
Understood. Like Schrute, it sounded more defensive. So, my apologies for making more of that than you intended.The insults that I'll ignore was a direct reference to the people that will always accuse me of being a shill... which I get. It was tongue in cheek and no it wasnt sympathetic it was my attempt at humor after a long day.
That's fair. As you mentioned, the issue was with communication. I live near Seattle now. Many other hardcore Kings fans still live outside the LA area, so we wouldn't have had a preferrable method to dink around to check it out. We can really only see what we see.Once again.... it's an issue of communication.
MOST things in life are about communication.
It was an issue of communication. Execution wise everything worked fairly well beyond the audio issue and since I wasn't there in Quebec I can't speak directly too but they did fix it fairly quickly.
Me saying everything went "completely right" is (perhaps) a poor attempt on my part to tone police and try and instill my own (admittedly biased) perspective into the narrative.
And I get it - I provide support for SaaS and telling people "it's working as expected" doesn't resonate well in some circumstances. Maybe some of the frustrations I hear rubbed off on me.
I'm not familiar with broadcasting technology and I'll take your word for it. Maybe this is unreasonable, though, but when a team 'plans' to do something (e.g. stream a game), things get prepared and set up ahead of time. I'm not saying this is the case (as again, this stems back to communication), this is what it looks like from the outside:Had we simply NOT streamed the game there would have been complaints about it
We chose to stream the game on multiple platforms and to overlay the english audio onto the French TV broadcast.
It was incredibly complicated and took a bunch of work from a bunch of people to pull off and generally speaking I thought it worked fantastically.
- team tries to stream the game
- They have the option to have a looping video of "Game Starting Shortly", stream the game without audio so the fans see there's a ceremony, add audio so fans can enjoy it, or have a banner explain there is a ceremony and to stand by. Of all the different options, the decision was made to stream a channel (of which apparently there were people who didn't know what was on that channel).
- the stream begins, but then there's no audio.
That looks sloppy and unprepared. I fully believe there are plenty of factors in play that can't be communicated, but as a layman, and seeing how other streams go, I struggle to reconcile that it went well. You had people recover well, but with better preparation, do you honestly think that it was planned as well as it could have been?
Again, I'm admittedly ignorant of broadcasting technologies. But as a well-seasoned couch potato, I also don't see what happened last night happen with other streams.
I appreciate you updating us and expressing this. I just feel there were other decisions and issues aside from communication, though that appears to be the biggest.So from my perspective it went completely right outside of us not knowing or telling anyone that the first 14 minutes would be a cartoon.
Which is a perfect example of why communication is so important and a perfect demonstration of why I wish we had communicated better.
I agree with this to a degree. The thing is, he had already won gold with Akil Thomas as a 17 year-old. And he was playing as a third-liner alongside Jack Quinn for most of the tournament.@johnjm22 @King'sPawn
I was saying this about QB back during that WJC and for his start in the LA: he defers to vets.
He was still a young guy at that WJC and really never tried to do anything flashy or "dangerous". He came in to LA, did some things on the rush every once in awhile but was, for the most part, safe and boring. Even when we started to see some success for him playing with 11 and 9, he never seemed to be looking for his own thing.
You score a goal like the one against CBJ, sign yourself a nice guaranteed contract and actually feel like a man playing in a man's league...well, the sky is the limit. He doesn't have to defer to anyone and getting him away from Kopitar's line is a great thing. Have him be the center on a line and go ahead and stick the wild card Fiala next to him so he gets the puck in more scoring situations. Scoring = confidence and it is time for him to be the top scoring center on this team.
He's been in and out of the NHL for four seasons so it is hard to remember that he has barely played two full NHL seasons when it comes to games played.
I'll see if I can find them, but the metrics and eye test improved as he was moved away from Quinn. Quinn's 11 months older, but it was also his first (and it wasn't lost on people that Quinn's coach in juniors was also the WJC coach).
The point is, I think the deferring to vets is more closely tied to a confidence issue, and I think some of that confidence was inadvertently affected when he has to play in a lesser role - which is what he was doing in the WJC and in the NHL.
Plus in Sudbury, he led the entire team in scoring in 2019-20, when he was 17 years old. Over half his team was older. Heck, he led the team in scoring as a 16 year-old rookie. So, how much deferring was he really doing? I know quality of competition matters, but if he just naturally always deferred to vets, I would expect to see similar patterns in the past.