Toggle sidebar

Potential Trade Targets (2025 edition)

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
If you're going after Pettersson, why did you trade Hagel? Part of the argument was Hegel will be too old for the next great hawk team.

I don't think Chicago would be involved w acquiring Pettersson.

Bytheway, Hagel is having himself a year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pez68 and Drumman44
ploppsdman said:
If you're going after Pettersson, why did you trade Hagel? Part of the argument was Hegel will be too old for the next great hawk team.

I don't think Chicago would be involved w acquiring Pettersson.

Bytheway, Hagel is having himself a year.
Click to expand...

Hagel would be nasty alongside Bedard.

But, they wouldn't have been able to get Bedard if they held on to a guy like Hagel.

Hawkaholic said:
I'm not interested in Pettersson unless its a deal with Seth Jones going the other way.
Click to expand...

I'd trade Seth in an Ed Monix type deal if his immovable contract wasn't a factor.
 
Kevin Musto said:
Boisvert, KK, and Toronto 1st for Pettersson would do wonders for the rebuild
Click to expand...

If I'm Vancouver I say no to that because I want the best piece in the return to be better than this. I'd demand one of Nazar or Levshunov.

You don't give up a center who has scored 100+ points and gets Selke votes for 2nd and 3rd best pieces/picks.
 
Kevin Musto said:
Boisvert, KK, and Toronto 1st for Pettersson would do wonders for the rebuild
Click to expand...
I would not include Nazar but your above combo with picks would be fine by me. maybe even an extra 2nd to sweeten the pot..Is it bad that I want Pettersson, but then still want to tank the rest of the season? If we trade KK I think its more imperative than ever to land Schaefer.
 
GIADF said:
If I'm Vancouver I say no to that because I want the best piece in the return to be better than this. I'd demand one of Nazar or Levshunov.

You don't give up a center who has scored 100+ points and gets Selke votes for 2nd and 3rd best pieces/picks
Click to expand...

GIADF said:
If I'm Vancouver I say no to that because I want the best piece in the return to be better than this. I'd demand one of Nazar or Levshunov.

You don't give up a center who has scored 100+ points and gets Selke votes for 2nd and 3rd best pieces/picks.
Click to expand...
Nucks are backed into an absolute corner with this Pettersson/JT Miller situation. I really don't think they get as much as what you think he is perceived to be worth. Pettersson is signed to an absolutely massive contract with term and putting up numbers like a guy making 4mil per. The relationship between EP and JT is creating a hugely divisive situation on that team and they are going to be desperate to get rid of one. I personally think its going to be JT Miller and not EP
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beukeboom Fan
BHFAN92 said:
Nucks are backed into an absolute corner with this Pettersson/JT Miller situation. I really don't think they get as much as what you think he is perceived to be worth. Pettersson is signed to an absolutely massive contract with term and putting up numbers like a guy making 4mil per. The relationship between EP and JT is creating a hugely divisive situation on that team and they are going to be desperate to get rid of one. I personally think its going to be JT Miller and not EP
Click to expand...

I agree, I'm not sure these hypotheticals matter as I also think it's Miller that'll be traded.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BHFAN92
RememberTheRoar said:


Slightly off topic, but on the topic of your obsessions over non-lottery picks. Looks like the analytics guys think one of your golden boys doesn’t have any value as someone who can balance salaries in a trade.
Click to expand...

Would New Jersey trade Mercer for Reichel?
 
Would Seattle trade whichever of Shane Wright or Berkly Catton they like less for Korchinski? All their best prospects are Forwards
 
What would the Hawks be looking for in return for Jones at 50% retained?

What about Hall at 50% retained? Just curious on both. Thanks!
 
If Chicago retained 50% of Seth's contract your talking what ...roughly $23-25 million or so?

What's the market value of that much salary retention? Probably a lot.

I don't forecast Jones being dealt anytime soon unless it's contract for contract.

Say, Pettersson for Jones and Korchinski.

Hall isn't worth anything - my guess is that they'll trade him to do him a solid or keep him if he wants to stay.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeafChief
Jones 50% retained is an insanely valuable asset. Imagine having a 2D with 1D upside for 5 years at 4.75 million. It would make no sense for any team to pay the price.

I don’t like many Toronto prospects but for me to retain nearly 30 million I’d need Cowan (whom I don’t like at all) and 3 firsts maybe? Essentially the top offer sheet price.
 
RememberTheRoar said:
Ya, I’m not exactly sure why giving up assets is preferable to Laz than signing someone like Marner. In his own, worst case, scenario Marner is roughly $3.5 million more expensive than EP.

Would you rather have $3.5 million less in cap space but keep Nazar, Korchinski, and the TOR 1st? Or have the extra space but none of those additional assets. That’s likely the cost of an okay third in the rising cap environment.
Click to expand...
Agree on the general premise, but if MM is $3.5M more than EP that's a $15M AAV, correct?
 
GIADF said:
If I'm Vancouver I say no to that because I want the best piece in the return to be better than this. I'd demand one of Nazar or Levshunov.

You don't give up a center who has scored 100+ points and gets Selke votes for 2nd and 3rd best pieces/picks.
Click to expand...
What's EP looked like over the 2 years since signing that deal?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom