He coached us out of the first round series vs Florida so all the goodwill from that Presidents trophy season was gone. Fans would have tried to hound him out this summer had we lost to the Leafs.
Not sure it's fair and I'm not sure the next coach will be an improvement but with no extension it's an any day now situation after the bad start.
He will get another NHL job and isn't a bad coach. Injured Bergeron wanting to play vs Florida instead of heal for the next series and letting Ullmark stay in after some pathetic games will be what sunk him.
That and several other highly dubious incidents.
For example, he allowed Patrice to play in a meaningless late season Montreal game, the game in which Bergeron was injured.
With the first round against the Panthers set to begin, Montgomery asked Patrice if he was good to go.
Unsurprisingly, Bergeron replied in the affirmative.
If you recall correctly, Bergeron and DK#46 did not play in the first few games of that series. You may also recall, they were up three games to one when Montgomery inserted both into the lineup.
Both were banged up. Both were subpar. Both played a role in the Bruins subsequent implosion.
Think about this.
You are the head coach of an NHL club.
It is under your purview, and it is your ultimate responsibility to decide who plays, and who does not.
Patrice Bergeron is a first ballot Hall of Fame inductee. Perhaps they will even rename the Frank Selke award after him.
Nevertheless, a head coach does not defer to any of his players. He makes the decisions. He is the final arbiter.
Incredibly, Montgomery ceded this responsibility to a player, not least a player who was obviously injured and hence likely to prove ineffective. Which was the case.
Amateur hour.
Do I make too much of this? Perhaps.
Yet it is only a minor illustration among many of Jim Montgomery's incompetence and unsuitability for the job of an NHL head coach.
I could cite several examples to support my argument.
Should they wish to do so, others can take up the case from there,