Speculation: Potential Coaching Replacements for Jim Montgomery

PB37

Mr Selke
Oct 1, 2002
26,240
21,909
Maine
What are the options? Most of us don’t hear the back door chatter that you insiders do. How can we talk about offloading a malcontent if we don’t know who they are?

I'm going to assume he means Sacco when Monty was hired two years ago. If the Bruins wanted a fresh slate with Monty and new voices for the team to listen to, it didn't make sense to keep an assistant who is now working under his 3rd head coach boss for the same team. Maybe Sacco is a little bitter he keeps getting passed over for the job after paying his dues for 10 years now?
 

DominicT

Registered User
Sep 6, 2009
20,519
37,558
Stratford Ontario
dom.hockey
What are the options? Most of us don’t hear the back door chatter that you insiders do. How can we talk about offloading a malcontent if we don’t know who they are?
What I said is something I've been saying for two years. Someone needed to be fired two years ago.

We can debate who that should have been, but someone needed to pay the price.

I don't know what this insider stuff is all about.
 

DKH

Worst Poster/Awful Takes
Feb 27, 2002
76,592
57,605
Never forget how happy and elated Avs fans were when Sacco left.
Yes. I remember it well. Avalanche HFB legends Lanch Armstrong & Hackey Sakic saying they celebrated by getting stoned and jumping off the Tallahassee Bridge screaming ‘Sacco sucks’

Lanch was wearing a Ray Bourque signed 2003 Avs jersey and unfortunately it didn’t have the fight strap and ……

RIP
 

DKH

Worst Poster/Awful Takes
Feb 27, 2002
76,592
57,605
My mistake. I misread your post.
Sacco Magic

He’s kinda sorta the VP here ~ he was named associate coach so he takes over

0.0 he doesn’t get the job

I’ll bet anyone a real TD Garden cheesesteak if Monty goes he’s got the job

Heck I’ll take a sausage peppers and onions - very good also

That Garden Grille is legit folks. Legit

You tell me what game your going I’ll show up for a free dinner
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PlayMakers

GordonHowe

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 21, 2005
17,215
18,651
Newton, MA.
Fair enough- I would just add that while he may have been brought in to coach the defense, it is always Monty's final decision on what he wants them doing in his system or whatever he calls it. If that isn't working for the players (as it hasn't been for whatever reason) there is not much Leach can do about it. Some of the stupid stuff we've seen out there are things any NHL coach has a right to expect that players at that level should know.
"In his system or whatever he calls it."

There you have it.

Did the players suddenly get stupid? Or are they poorly coached?

Does Montgomery have a defensive system?

A scheme?

A plan?

Please to answer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff

GordonHowe

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 21, 2005
17,215
18,651
Newton, MA.
He coached us out of the first round series vs Florida so all the goodwill from that Presidents trophy season was gone. Fans would have tried to hound him out this summer had we lost to the Leafs.

Not sure it's fair and I'm not sure the next coach will be an improvement but with no extension it's an any day now situation after the bad start.

He will get another NHL job and isn't a bad coach. Injured Bergeron wanting to play vs Florida instead of heal for the next series and letting Ullmark stay in after some pathetic games will be what sunk him.
That and several other highly dubious incidents.

For example, he allowed Patrice to play in a meaningless late season Montreal game, the game in which Bergeron was injured.

With the first round against the Panthers set to begin, Montgomery asked Patrice if he was good to go.

Unsurprisingly, Bergeron replied in the affirmative.

If you recall correctly, Bergeron and DK#46 did not play in the first few games of that series. You may also recall, they were up three games to one when Montgomery inserted both into the lineup.

Both were banged up. Both were subpar. Both played a role in the Bruins subsequent implosion.

Think about this.

You are the head coach of an NHL club.

It is under your purview, and it is your ultimate responsibility to decide who plays, and who does not.

Patrice Bergeron is a first ballot Hall of Fame inductee. Perhaps they will even rename the Frank Selke award after him.

Nevertheless, a head coach does not defer to any of his players. He makes the decisions. He is the final arbiter.

Incredibly, Montgomery ceded this responsibility to a player, not least a player who was obviously injured and hence likely to prove ineffective. Which was the case.

Amateur hour.

Do I make too much of this? Perhaps.

Yet it is only a minor illustration among many of Jim Montgomery's incompetence and unsuitability for the job of an NHL head coach.

I could cite several examples to support my argument.

Should they wish to do so, others can take up the case from there,

🚽 🧻 🪠 👈 👀
 

Ad

Ad

Ad