I floated this idea around before but simply put, unless Dylan Strome is some PK savant I didn't know about, he doesn't have a spot to play on this roster.
And even if he was, we can put him on wing over Hunt but is Dylan Strome on the 4th line really but is that what this team is missing? Are we trading Kravtsov for a 4th liner?
I think we wait for a better deal. I'd trade him for two 2nds or a 1st.
A few people have stated this but I don't agree or even understand at all. Unfortunately, the problem is that D. Strome would fit directly into our top 9 and be an upgrade. Which is why I fear Drury might do something like that.
Pretty simple, who's keeping Dylan out of the top 9? Goodrow? Gauthier? Blais? No way. Those are ideally 4th line players.
Strome as much as I dislike him, is at least a legit middle 6 player.
It's really easy. Either he slots in at 2C moving Ryan Strome to 2RW, or Dylan slots in on Ryan's wing at 2RW.
or
Dylan slots in at 3C, pushing Chytil to 3RW, or Chytil stays at 3C and Dylan plays at 3Rw, serving as the faceoff winger that Chytil badly needs if they keep him at center. At least for the time being until he improves at faceoffs.
And regardless, and unfortunately, Dylan would give us a better lineup than we currently have. Especially without Kravtsov. Without Krav, there is plenty of room for Dylan Strome.
Blais is a decent player but he's not ideal for the top 9. Goodrow has almost zero offensive game and is an ideal 4th liner. Gauthier, a good depth player or maybe 4th liner. Or at least someone you can slip into the 3rd line if need be. But not on par with Dylan, Chytil or whichever of Laf or Kreider could play at 3LW. And Hunt well, really, who cares about Hunt, he's pure depth.
Drury seems obsessed with gritty depth players. And he went way overboard this summer. We did not need all of Goodrow, Reeves, Blais and Hunt. Especially with Barron waiting in the wings. In reality, we only needed 2 of those 4, ideally 4th line players. But now we are stuck with 4 of them having to play one on the 3rd line, which isn't a good thing. And we would still likely need to keep 1 of them on the 3rd line anyway, even with Dylan.
Ideally, Drury should have brought in a middle 6 center either way. But with Kravtsov, we could get away without it. Now without Krav, we probably can't.
Does anyone really want to see Goodrow on the 3rd line? Gauthier? Once Ryan is healthy, does anyone really like a 3rd line of Goodrow-Chytil-Gauthier? Absolutely putrid. This isn't 1988 where our 3rd line is a "checking" line. We need our 3rd line to contribute offensively and that 3rd line would contribute almost nothing. In fact, I think it would only hurt Chytil's progress long term.
Laf - Zib - Kreider (or Laf - Zib - Kakko) or (Laf - Zib - R. Strome)
Panarin - R.Strome - Kakko (or Panarin - D. Strome - R. Strome) or (Panarin - R. Strome - Chytil)
Blais - Chytil - D. Strome (or Blais - D. Strome - Chytil) or (Kreider - D. Strome - Gauthier)
Anyway you look at it, any of these options, again unfortunately are better than putting out a 3rd line of Goodrow - Chytil - Gauthier or even Blais - Chytil - Gauthier or Blais - Chytil - Goodrow.
Gauthier - Strome - Chytil (or