I think you are wildly understating Tanev and McCabe.That doesn't really mean much to just say it though..
I understand what the claim is, but what is the evidence of the claim?
I think you are wildly understating Tanev and McCabe.
I think the truth is that both teams are good defensively. The Leafs GA is probably slightly higher based off of some bad performances from Hildeby and Murray....I also don't think the Leafs are some suffocating defensive juggernaut either because our PK can be flat out bad. That does matter. But we are very good at limiting chances in high danger areas at even strength and not allowing 2nd and 3rd chances. Stolarz helps too.Perhaps. Perhaps others are underestimating the sens top 4 this year?
They've been playing much better than previous years...have these improvements been taken into account?
The claim was that the Leafs have better goaltending and defense and offense...so how do the sens allow less goals if their goaltending and defense is worse? Is it that Ottawa's forwards play a better defensive game to support their d? I would have said no at some points of the season and yes at others.
If the sens F is better defensively, should that play a part in which forward group is better?
Like, what are the Leafs worse at than the sens to allow more goals against?
Agree ..... to a point. The Leafs' core still disappear when play gets very physical, so if they end of up playing Florida in a round it is likely to be a short series.I have the Leafs in the Conference Final. They are a much harder team to play against this year.
I think you are wildly understating Tanev and McCabe.
I don't really disagree with any of this.I think the Sanderson/Zub pair is getting overlooked here too. They are one of the best (maybe THE best) purely defensive pairing in the league and Sanderson is well above average doing the heavy lifting offensively. If I were to rank the pairings I'd probably have it as something like this:
1. Sanderson/Zub
2a. Tanev/McCabe
2b. Rielly/Carlo
3. Chabot/Jensen
4. OEL/whoever
5. Kleven/whoever
I think anyone claiming it's either side "AINEC" are out to lunch. They seem like comparable groups at face value. Personally give the Senators the slight edge because A) I'm a homer and B) I think the gap between Sanderson/Zub and whoever the Leafs top pairing is offsets the slight edge the Leafs have on pairing 2 and 3.
If the 4Nations wasn't Jake Sanderson's coming out party I think this playoffs will certainly be it. This guys is legit.
I think the truth is that both teams are good defensively. The Leafs GA is probably slightly higher based off of some bad performances from Hildeby and Murray....I also don't think the Leafs are some suffocating defensive juggernaut either because our PK can be flat out bad. That does matter. But we are very good at limiting chances in high danger areas at even strength and not allowing 2nd and 3rd chances. Stolarz helps too.
I definitely never said the Leafs are better in every facet. I think the Leafs have an advantage at 1C and 2C...Sens have one at 3C. Sens have a better top end of there defense...Leafs probably have more depth on defense. I think it is a 6 or 7 game series that gets won or lost on the margins and breaks one way or another.Good points but I feel like you could say similar things or have a similar sounding paragraph describing the sens GA. They have some struggles here and there but otherwise have been very solid. Haven't allowed as many odd man rushes as previous years or guys standing alone in the slot for 5 business days. Can also say our GA got brought down by some poor performances by Forsberg for example...or when we played hamonic too high in our lineup for no reason. Otherwise they've been solid.
And like I originally said, I wasn't saying Ottawa is better, but I don't see how Toronto is definitively better this year on d or in nets.
I think the Leafs can score more in bunches and the sens offense can dry up...otherwise I see similarly teams for d and goalie.
The only real advantage I see for the Leafs is the top end of their forward group. Otherwise very comparable. I don't agree that the Leafs are better at every faucet than the sens.
Anyone can just make up percentagesDepends on the match up
Florida probably dusts us
Tampa Bay 50/50
Sens or Habs about a 75% chance Leafs win
It's looking like Leafs vs Sens, I think Leafs win in 6 or 7 but it's gonna be tough. Hungry team and Brady is going to be a nightmare to handle in a playoff series. Sanderson is also super under-rated.
There's no easy match up but I like the way the team is constructed this year and the full team commitment to a two-way game.
Leafs D core isNot sure they have better defense either...
It Rielly, Ekman Larsson, McCabe, and tanev better than Sanderson, Chabot, Jensen and zub? I'm not too sure..
Rielly is having a down year...38 points and -14...then 33 year old OEL who isn't what he used to be...Jake McCabe...35 year old tanev...
I'm not saying Ottawa is better but I don't see how Toronto has the better d.
Its almost no argument that Sanderson is the best...then you could argue Chabot over Rielly this year...than it's defensive responsible d like Jensen and zub vs McCabe and tanev...
I dunno. Maybe it's the homer in me, but I take the sens D as well.
The sens have allowed less goals against than Toronto despite Toronto playing more time in the offensive zone with better offensive stars...so maybe, just maybe, Ottawa has better goalies/D.
I definitely never said the Leafs are better in every facet. I think the Leafs have an advantage at 1C and 2C...Sens have one at 3C. Sens have a better top end of there defense...Leafs probably have more depth on defense. I think it is a 6 or 7 game series that gets won or lost on the margins and breaks one way or another.