Confirmed with Link: POJ to PIT, ??? to STL

BusinessGoose

Registered User
May 19, 2022
5,179
4,814
Sacramento, CA
Riveting stuff



For free i dont really care. Would have been pretty irked if Dubas let POJ walk only to pay value for him 5 months later.

I imagine the Pens will end up sending him down in a couple weeks and St. Louis probably claims him again.

P.O. is back because the Penguins are decimated at defense at all levels.

The Baby Pens have struggled lately because of the mounting defensive injuries, so the Pens can send Clurman back down.

PO knows the system, so there is no acclimation period.

There could be more in the works, too. Tony Androckitis, who covers the AHL, said Boris Katchouk - who has played well at center for WBS - was a surprise scratch tonight. He could be the future considerations since he's not signed to an NHL deal.

EDIT: Also, this makes the pairings a bit more palatable for a while, because POJ and Letang have history.

POJ - Letang
Pickering - Karlsson
Graves - Grzelcyk
Shea

Then you figure things out when Petts comes back.
 

Sideline

Registered User
May 23, 2004
11,575
3,544
This seems fine. The Penguins needed help on the left side, especially if Petterson is being sold off at the deadline.
 

BusinessGoose

Registered User
May 19, 2022
5,179
4,814
Sacramento, CA
This seems fine. The Penguins needed help on the left side, especially if Petterson is being sold off at the deadline.
Every GM when Kyle *do not answer* comes up on their phones...

best-i-can-5ace4c.jpg
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Sideline

Freeptop

Registered User
Jun 17, 2009
2,418
1,327
Pittsburgh, PA
Love to re-acquire players we could have just held on to for free.
The funny thing is, this way, Joseph actually costs them less than if they'd retained him "for free", since his cap hit is now pro-rated, and the only thing they're giving up is "future considerations".

As an amusing side note, this is the second time in five months that the Pens have traded future considerations to the Blues (previous time was for Hayes). I'm pretty sure those considerations were satisfied when the Pens traded draft picks with them later to allow the Blues to get their own second round pick back in order to be able to issue an offer sheet.
 

BlindWillyMcHurt

ti kallisti
May 31, 2004
36,384
31,475
The funny thing is, this way, Joseph actually costs them less than if they'd retained him "for free", since his cap hit is now pro-rated, and the only thing they're giving up is "future considerations".

As an amusing side note, this is the second time in five months that the Pens have traded future considerations to the Blues (previous time was for Hayes). I'm pretty sure those considerations were satisfied when the Pens traded draft picks with them later to allow the Blues to get their own second round pick back in order to be able to issue an offer sheet.

Armstrong owes Dubas years of favorable deals for taking on Hayes so I'm not surprised they are doing a lot of business this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gurglesons

HandshakeLine

A real jerk thing
Nov 9, 2005
49,531
34,196
Praha, CZ
Agreed, losing those future considerations are really going to slow down the rebuild
You’re right the cost is nigh inconsequential , it’s just like why not have held on to him in the first place? This team just loves reaquiring players they don’t actually want and I don’t get it: Kapanen, Hallander, POJ.

I guess it’s less even that we are paying anything it’s just like why bring back a player coaching staff did not like in the first place?

The funny thing is, this way, Joseph actually costs them less than if they'd retained him "for free", since his cap hit is now pro-rated, and the only thing they're giving up is "future considerations".

As an amusing side note, this is the second time in five months that the Pens have traded future considerations to the Blues (previous time was for Hayes). I'm pretty sure those considerations were satisfied when the Pens traded draft picks with them later to allow the Blues to get their own second round pick back in order to be able to issue an offer sheet.
Yeah that part makes sense to me. It’s just confusing to me that Sullivan hated POJ here so we’re bringing him back?
 

Randy Butternubs

Registurd User
Mar 15, 2008
30,606
22,659
Morningside
The funny thing is, this way, Joseph actually costs them less than if they'd retained him "for free", since his cap hit is now pro-rated, and the only thing they're giving up is "future considerations".

As an amusing side note, this is the second time in five months that the Pens have traded future considerations to the Blues (previous time was for Hayes). I'm pretty sure those considerations were satisfied when the Pens traded draft picks with them later to allow the Blues to get their own second round pick back in order to be able to issue an offer sheet.

Has a trade ever been done for Past Considerations?
 

eXile3

Registered User
Dec 12, 2020
4,730
4,608
How hurt is Aho? I thought he was perfect for these type of situations.

No issue with bringing in POJ to be a warm body.
 

pistolpete11

Registered User
Apr 27, 2013
12,081
11,119
I like POJ. I didn't want to see him leave, though, I understand the concern about arbitration.

He had a promising rookie year. 21 points in 75 games +8. Pretty good underlying stats, 53% xGF, 57% actual GF%.

Last season he was in and out of the lineup due to injury and Sullivan and for a good portion of that, he was paired with Ruhwedel. Judging by the TOI, it looks like March 22 when he was paired with Letang. Form that point on, he had 6 points in 14 games and was a +7. He's not going to anchor a pairing with anyone you put on there with him (Ruhwedel/Shea/Ludvig/etc.), but if you put him with other competent players (Letang/Rutta), the results seem pretty good to me.

He's still relatively young at 25. Former 1st rounder. Cheap. Fans already soured on from his time here, but if he was an unknown to Penguin fans, I think this trade would receive more praise.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad