Rants Mulliniks
Registered User
- Jun 22, 2008
- 23,176
- 6,223
Just do what we did in the three game series where we completely humiliated them.
Moore will never play ahead of Simmonds in the playoffs ...he's just starting to round back into form, and his size and toughness are neededThe dominance of Hyman with Matthews and Marner is just too much to pass up. I'd go with:
Hyman - Matthews - Marner
Foligno - Tavares - Nylander
Mikheyev - Nash - Kerfoot
Thornton - Moore - Spezza
Simmonds and Galchenyuk would be the odd men out for me. You don't even need to worry about matchups with this line up. Every one is responsible defensively.
The dominance of Hyman with Matthews and Marner is just too much to pass up. I'd go with:
Hyman - Matthews - Marner
Foligno - Tavares - Nylander
Mikheyev - Nash - Kerfoot
Thornton - Moore - Spezza
Simmonds and Galchenyuk would be the odd men out for me. You don't even need to worry about matchups with this line up. Every one is responsible defensively.
Yea - I'm not getting that either. Moore? And there was even a response on it referencing Moore... did I miss something?
LOL Brooks. I've always got those two mixed up..... did I miss something?
Yea - I'm not getting that either. Moore? And there was even a response on it referencing Moore.
I think it might be lost on themMoore will never play ahead of Simmonds in the playoffs ...he's just starting to round back into form, and his size and toughness are needed
Foligno - Matthews - Marner
Simmonds - Tavares - Nylander
Mikheyev - Nash - Hyman
Thornton - Kerfoot - Spezza
Galy is a likely bet to sit if Nash is healthy ...and they can flip flop Kerfoot and Nash too depending on if they need speed or faceoff wins and more weight.
Nash is like the Bermuda Triangle for offense ...hmmn, do youngsters these days even know what the Bermuda Triangle is?
That was the most dominating and fast paced games we played before these last few here. The best part of that series really was Mikheyev for me. There was everyone else playing great and then there was Mikheyev. Keefe should show him them games before playoffs start and say, just play like that. Best i have ever seen him play and McDavid was out matched by him in skating numerous times.Just do what we did in the three game series where we completely humiliated them.
Brooks is good. Marner and Matthews are beast but everything flows through brooks.LOL Brooks. I've always got those two mixed up...
That was the most dominating and fast paced games we played before these last few here. The best part of that series really was Mikheyev for me. There was everyone else playing great and then there was Mikheyev. Keefe should show him them games before playoffs start and say, just play like that. Best i have ever seen him play and McDavid was out matched by him in skating numerous times.
That group of games got the Oilers to tighten up their game after that series. I think they were humiliated bad.
LOL Brooks. I've always got those two mixed up...
I know.....and this was before we added the likes of Foligno and Nash!
Keep matched his best against Nash in last years Games against Columbus. Keefe said, you do that to gain a scoring edge. At least you think you will,it didn’t work out like that against him.
Keefe seems to have a higher opinion of him than on the board. I’m going to watch and see what Nash brings before i call him anything but a checking center that can shut down the best apparently. Thats just what he’s always done.
Now he’s just a run of the mill 4 th liner. I’m not so sure thats all he is yet.
As I've said many times, Hyman can play on any line. His playing style is adaptable. I tend to want him to be in the top six come playoffs, which makes this a bit tricky as I also believe Gally can be an important contributor for this team.
There are clearly going to be decisions made by Keefe. My personal opinion would be to have Galchenyuk in and Mikheyev out. Galchenyuk isn't as fast as Mik, but he is harder on the puck. If he plays both ways, he's a major asset in a playoff run. Of this I am in agreement, if Gally doesn't work hard on D, he is half as valuable.
I like Mik, he is creative, his speed alone is a weapon. On the flip side, Galchenyuk can help pin in opponents, he also finishes from time to time, draws penalties and has a bit of a fire in his belly. I've watched him take shots from guys after the whistle and he gives it right back in a "I'm not backing down" manner. I want those guys all week, twice on Sundays. It's the consistency issue. If he plays as he did his first week here, it's an easy decision.
Leafs are in the enviable position of having depth and options, it's obviously a call the coach has to make based on his feel. If I am the opposition team, I prefer to see Mik in the lineup rather than Galchenyuk.