Whether they make the playoffs or not is inconsequential. What really matters is they keep fighting for it.
I wanted high picks. I didn't mind if the team was still bad for 4 to 5 years running (being the 4th year), because it's quite simply the minimum expected norm, not just for rebuilds, but just based on the logic of the time it takes for drafted players to come in AND also develop. And finally flourish.
Despite all that, one has to be impressed with the constant progression the team has had. It's often repeated that progression is not linear, but shit, if they play ,500 till the end of the season, they'll finish with 85 pts. That would actually be a pretty linear, constant progression.
55 ->+13= 68 -->+8= 76 --->+9=85
Making up 30pts in 3 years is incredibly impressive for a team that finished dead last 35 months ago. And that's without getting the luck of drafting first in a strong draft year and getting an instant superstar (Kane, Matthews, Celebrini, Mack) or even luckier, a generational player (Crosby, McJesus).
That ~85pts team will still add important pieces from our drafts, like Demidov and Reinbacher, on top of having plenty of cap space to pounce on opportunities. I just don't get the Nancies. Everything has to meet their expectations, nevermind the actual results. If anyone thought they'd be a 90-100 pts team already, they had irrealistic expectations.
This is when Hughes' toughest tasks are ahead, but give him some friggin time to do it ffs. Same with MSL. The results should speak loudly enough, but people constantly nitpick at things without recognizing the broader picture. They've been impressive relative to appropriate expectations and should be given leeway, for now.
And please people, stop using Buffalo as an example of whatever narrative you're trying to peddle. We're already ahead of Buffalo and they've been rebuilding for 15 years. We've managed to stick around with Detroit and Ottawa and they've both been rebuilding for far longer.