CokenoPepsi
Registered User
- Oct 28, 2016
- 5,142
- 2,587
Kane in 2010
Crawford in 2013
Keith in 2015
The CS award is a bit tricky you obviously have quite a few biased reporters (see 2016 as great example) and it is really moment based for example Kane scored his second career playoff hattrick against the Kings to finish them off but did have a few stinkers against the Wings that year but because he is a winger it is much less noticeable.
Crawford on the other hand is the goalie so much focus is on him so when he let in those 5 goals in one game that was it along with Kane also doing his Kane thing in the final setting up another OT winner and being the Hawks only offense in game 5.
2010 is a different story all together there was certainly an agenda there with the Toews win, not saying he was bad at all... he was amazing against the Canucks but then outside of that nothing outstanding and then we all know against the Flyers he was simply well bad. It seemed like he just hung onto the award by a thread if the voting for the award was actually voted on at the end of the game I cannot see how Kane doesn't win the award by doing his Kane thing again.
Crawford in 2013
Keith in 2015
The CS award is a bit tricky you obviously have quite a few biased reporters (see 2016 as great example) and it is really moment based for example Kane scored his second career playoff hattrick against the Kings to finish them off but did have a few stinkers against the Wings that year but because he is a winger it is much less noticeable.
Crawford on the other hand is the goalie so much focus is on him so when he let in those 5 goals in one game that was it along with Kane also doing his Kane thing in the final setting up another OT winner and being the Hawks only offense in game 5.
2010 is a different story all together there was certainly an agenda there with the Toews win, not saying he was bad at all... he was amazing against the Canucks but then outside of that nothing outstanding and then we all know against the Flyers he was simply well bad. It seemed like he just hung onto the award by a thread if the voting for the award was actually voted on at the end of the game I cannot see how Kane doesn't win the award by doing his Kane thing again.