Martyros
Allow me to retort
Let's see what they do in regular NHL competition before we call it a homerun.
Pronman said:The Kings have an elite farm system, but their rebuild still has a long way to go, as the bulk of their top young talent is still very young and outside the NHL. Part of the reason their ranking didn’t budge much was the uncertainty surrounding Gabriel Vilardi, who I was very high at on this time last year.
Why?Let's see what they do in regular NHL competition before we call it a homerun.
Pronman came out with another list, ranking teams by their 23-and-under core: Pronman: Ranking NHL teams by their 23 and under core,... He certainly likes his lists, and I like summarizing them here, so....
As previously noted, he has the Kings' farm ranked # 4, but for the 23-and-under group as a whole, he has us ranked # 24 - reflecting the talent gap that grew when we were chasing cups and handing out picks, leading to today's dearth of high-impact young NHLers. He writes:
Why?
Our 2 first rounders are likely NHL ready by next season, our third looks like he'll be here in 2-3 while our fourth rounder is looking like a faster, grittier and better scoring Tanner Pearson... Thats a HR in my books.. whether its 35 or 50 lolThe ball has to go over the fence before it is a home run. They don't just let Mike Trout run around the bases when he steps in the on-deck circle.
That being said, this draft looks like a 35-50 HR guy in the on-deck circle.
Pretty sure you have to hit the ball first before you run back to home plate.Why?
Critical self evaluation is key for an organization's success. Some mistakes are harder to correct than others. I think .time will have taken care of most of those by the time the new core reaches the age range of 22-25.I really like that Blake is acknowledging his shortcomings and deficiencies, and is thus bringing in Hextall to make sure he's "doing it right"
Our 2 first rounders are likely NHL ready by next season, our third looks like he'll be here in 2-3 while our fourth rounder is looking like a faster, grittier and better scoring Tanner Pearson... Thats a HR in my books.. whether its 35 or 50 lol
And the "steal of the draft" Pushkaryev as well.<insert picture of Brown/Boyle/Tambellini wearing '03 jerseys on draft day>
I blame the Hipaa laws.Remember when Vilardi was penciled into lineups around this time last year?
two of those are still NHLers so thats not too bad..<insert picture of Brown/Boyle/Tambellini wearing '03 jerseys on draft day>
Curious enough to know what Hextall did right with the flyers to suggest this is actually benefitial. Flyers sucked with him.
He built up their pipeline and they had a good developmental system. In terms of achievements though, his Flyers didn't accomplish much.
You can attribute that to scouting though can't you?
You can attribute that to scouting though can't you?
In one of the best draft class ever? Yes, that’s really badtwo of those are still NHLers so thats not too bad..
Brown has a good pick but yeah... the missed really bad with Boyle and Tams... but did we really want Corey Perry..In one of the best draft class ever? Yes, that’s really bad
I don't see what's so hard to understand that the initial rage of the Bjornfot pick subsided contingent upon the 2nd round pick of Kaliyev. No one ever said he was bad. Only that for a draft in which we needed scoring pop, leaving all that scoring on the board to go for a d-man was rage-inducing. Yes, the draft strategy worked, even though they were sweating like a ****e in church over it. Everyone's happy to have both, but this board has fallen really hard upon it's need to say "I told you so" even harder than the Kings have sucked.
No it really isn't. 15 of the guys taken in the first round in 2003 are out of the league, not to mention Corey Perry and Patrick Eaves are on life support.In one of the best draft class ever? Yes, that’s really bad