End of Line
Registered User
- Mar 20, 2009
- 26,295
- 4,318
Why do you do that to yourself.
7:30 in the morning and what a mistake it was to give that asshat a click.
Why do you do that to yourself.
I love everything I read and hear about Johnston. He makes a few strange personnel decisions, but overall I'm very pleased with him
Overall I like Johnston. His system seems pretty good and he seems to know what he's talking about.
However his lineups/usage is pretty much the same as Bylsma's. And that's what's frustrating.
The only issue i have is i wish Despres was getting more minutes. He should be top 4 easily right now. Every thing else i think falls into him just trying different combos and assessing different options which imo is a breath of fresh air. Hopefully Despres minutes last night was because of getting banged up in yesterdays practice. Thats been his only blemish imo.
I agree. Despres should be playing more for sure.
But of course the coach will trust the veteran's more than a younger player. Even if the veteran isn't as good.
So annoying.
Despres is getting the right amount of minutes because Johnston is running the bench very well right now despite the absences.
very funny
Despres is getting the right amount of minutes because Johnston is running the bench very well right now despite the absences.
Negatory.
Less Despres is actually pository and the coaching staff is doing a very good job in this regards.
Less Despres is actually pository and the coaching staff is doing a very good job in this regards.
Look man. I'm sorry that Despres screwed your girl or whatever, but he's a good defenseman and should be playing more.
Since the start of November, Despres Has averaged around 18 minutes a game... last game was the lowest ice time in that timeframe since a game vs the Senators where he was dinged for a moment. His highest ice time came in a 1-0 win vs Colorado, where he played 22 minutes.
The fact is he is a top 4 D but when everyone is healthy he is playing the minutes behind Letang, Maatta, Martin and Erhoff. and he isn't being helped by Scuds... that's just the company line... he is there to carry the puck for the immobile and terrible-at-passing scuderi. He helps scuds... not the other way around
Less TOI for Despres means less chance for pucks going in behind Fleury. I don't want to see Despres scratched once Maatta comes back but Johnston & Agnew need to monitor his minutes and Scuderi seems to be a good partner. The problem is where does this leave Bortuzzo?
Gordie's goal is to get a reaction out of people. I don't see how anyone can read his comments and take them seriously. His responses are so obvious I'm surprised he hasn't been infracted yet.
Shame on any of you for even responding.
Gordie's goal is to get a reaction out of people. I don't see how anyone can read his comments and take them seriously. His responses are so obvious I'm surprised he hasn't been infracted yet.
Shame on any of you for even responding.
It's a refreshing change from what we've been used to. MJ sounds like he knows exactly what he wants to do in situation A, B, and C. He also sounds like, during his interviews, that he is trying to educate the reporter and people listening at home.
Might not agree with everything he does, but I can understand what he's doing and the real test is how he handles the playoffs.
The whole Bylsma era I ignored anytime a mic was in front of him because it was going to be nothing but silence, clichés, question dodging, and refusing to acknowledge mistakes and shortcomings. A complete 180 now with MJ. I actually enjoy listening to him.
Overall I like Johnston. His system seems pretty good and he seems to know what he's talking about.
However his lineups/usage is pretty much the same as Bylsma's. And that's what's frustrating.
So if you take Dave Molinari and to some extent Stan Savaran off the table, who are the Pittsburgh hockey media guys that are worth a darn?