Gurglesons
Registered User
I think he is. Behind Yager and Blomqvist. Maybe Pickering? It’s more of a comment on how bad our pool is.
I think Puustinen + is his ceiling. I think Puus can turn into 40-50 point player. Koivunen maybe a 50-60 player?
Definitely would have preferred a 1st and a top tier prospect over what we got, but I’ve beat that to death.
I would go Yager, Pickering, Blomqvist, Murashov, and then everyone is kinda up in the air. I'd probably take Poulin or Ponomarev over Koivunen if we are talking "definitely could play in the NHL".
There are multiple false dichotomies and fallacies in this post. Please learn to have to honest discussions without pushing every topic ever to one extreme or another.
Not really. And I don't think it is pushing to the extreme or another.
A few posts ago I said this " One thing I will say about the trade. Carolina has given up some absolute gems in trades over the last few years from a "depth player" stand point..
Going back to the Vegas expansion trade..
They moved Nic Roy for Erik Haula
Luostarinen for Trochek
Hakanpaa for Fleury
Jake Bean to CBJ
Foegle for Ethan Bear
Lorentz for Burns
So, hopefully we get the benefit of one of those types of players in one of the assets we grabbed."
I'm looking at things both ways. For some reason you and @SEALBound want to criticize @Dipsy Doodle and I for complaining about prospects that were acquired a few weeks ago while somehow your takes on them are irreproachable?
The issue is we gave up Guentzel for a bunch of things versus focusing on getting value. It was a bad trade.