Prospect Info: Pittsburgh Penguins Prospects Thread: 2023-2024 Edition

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jesse

Registered User
Jun 28, 2005
1,712
1,701
Pittsburgh
Brunicke at 17 is so wild to me. I cannot understand the anchor attached to him given his pretty clear-cut skating ability and overall talent level.
 

CheckingLineCenter

Registered User
Aug 10, 2018
9,430
10,266
Brunicke at 17 is so wild to me. I cannot understand the anchor attached to him given his pretty clear-cut skating ability and overall talent level.

Danford kinda looks like a more advanced/less raw Brunicke and went 31st.

I think the question with both is their ability to put it on the tape over and over again under pressure.
 

Randy Butternubs

Registurd User
Mar 15, 2008
30,447
22,390
Morningside
Brunicke at 17 is so wild to me. I cannot understand the anchor attached to him given his pretty clear-cut skating ability and overall talent level.

I was also surprised to see him that low and had to double check my inputs. It's pretty much that he's still in Juniors and has a similar floor to everyone at that level. His production so far is also just okay.

His info:

Ceiling: 2nd pairing, Two way
Floor: Minor leaguer

That results in a Potential Rating of 3.6/10. Ceiling is 75% of the rating.

"Readiness" is more complicated to explain. But as of right now he's only at a 2.1/10.

Potential Rating is worth 5/8 overall, Readiness is 1/4, and draft position is the remaining 1/8.

The highest Potential Rating in the sheet is at a 6.4 (no spoilers). Bedard was a 9.0 last offseason.

And the highest Readiness is someone currently in the AHL who has a 7.0 (again, no spoilers -- you've gotta like and subscribe). Bedard was at a 7.9.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Tom Hanks

Malkinstheman

Registered User
Aug 12, 2012
10,226
9,872
Quoting my previous post on rankings since I messed up and had to update it.

Annnnd here is 20 to 11:

20​
tankov k
19​
broz t
18​
ludvig j
17​
brunicke h
16​
kral f
15​
gruden j
14​
jarventie e
13​
plante z
12​
swanson m
11​
gauthier t
Curious as to why the system ranks Plante so much higher than Lucius? Both are the same age but Lucius has been nearly PPG in college while Plante is just now entering college.
 

Randy Butternubs

Registurd User
Mar 15, 2008
30,447
22,390
Morningside
Curious as to why the system ranks Plante so much higher than Lucius? Both are the same age but Lucius has been nearly PPG in college while Plante is just now entering college.

Mostly due to their ceilings. Lucius = 3rd line two way player. Plante = 2nd line scorer. Lucius is more ready but that doesn't hold as much weight.

Their overall rating only differs by about 5 points.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Malkinstheman

SEALBound

Fancy Gina Carano
Sponsor
Jun 13, 2010
42,730
21,586
Brunicke at 17 is so wild to me. I cannot understand the anchor attached to him given his pretty clear-cut skating ability and overall talent level.
He's certainly a better skater than Maatta is but Maatta used good gap control and positioning to overcome a lack of top speed. I think his ability to move is sufficient enough to make it.
 

Jesse

Registered User
Jun 28, 2005
1,712
1,701
Pittsburgh
Mostly due to their ceilings. Lucius = 3rd line two way player. Plante = 2nd line scorer. Lucius is more ready but that doesn't hold as much weight.

Their overall rating only differs by about 5 points.

Late to the party here, Randy. Is this your data? Do you mind sharing the link so I can check it out? This is interesting stuff here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tom Hanks

Randy Butternubs

Registurd User
Mar 15, 2008
30,447
22,390
Morningside
Late to the party here, Randy. Is this your data? Do you mind sharing the link so I can check it out? This is interesting stuff here.

Yes it's my data in the sense that I basically just plug in numbers 1 through 10 in a big spreadsheet. I tried to make it fully objective but that wasn't possible. The original thought was to just do NHL Equivalency points, but points aren't everything. I don't watch as much hockey as I used to so now it's mostly based on articles/scouting reports I've read and their offensive output (plus their role).

I'll send you a PM today or tomorrow.
 

Turin

Erik Karlsson is good
Feb 27, 2018
24,042
28,473
So with Clarke being brought in, the Pens have both Toronto and Ottawa's former directors of scouting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jdodd

ChaosAgent

Registered User
May 8, 2018
18,567
12,612
Yes it's my data in the sense that I basically just plug in numbers 1 through 10 in a big spreadsheet. I tried to make it fully objective but that wasn't possible. The original thought was to just do NHL Equivalency points, but points aren't everything. I don't watch as much hockey as I used to so now it's mostly based on articles/scouting reports I've read and their offensive output (plus their role).

I'll send you a PM today or tomorrow.

I often think models that are open about subjectivity but aggregate it through various factors and point systems are better than the hardcore quant stuff for stuff like ranking prospects. I appreciate this.
 

WickedWrister

Registered User
Jul 25, 2008
11,246
5,872
Philadelphia
I know 4 on 4 prospect camp scrimmages isn't exactly the world juniors, but pretty impressive for Murashov to only concede one goal (Yager) in 3 games.

1720643715242.png
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad

Ad