bigdaddyk88
Registered User
- Apr 21, 2019
- 4,556
- 893
It is all good hopefully the new gm forced Sully to actually play the young guys and dumps the over 30 year oldsThey don't use asterisks Junior
It is all good hopefully the new gm forced Sully to actually play the young guys and dumps the over 30 year oldsThey don't use asterisks Junior
There is a way to send a message to the coach. Back in the day MLBs Oakland As had to take drastic measures when their field manager wouldn't play the guys the team wanted in the starting lineup. The GM finally sent a message to the manager when he traded away the manager's favourite player. It's in the movie Moneyball and based on the book of the same name.It is all good hopefully the new gm forced Sully to actually play the young guys and dumps the over 30 year olds
Hopefully that’s exactly what the new gm decides he is going to do.There is a way to send a message to the coach. Back in the day MLBs Oakland As had to take drastic measures when their field manager wouldn't play the guys the team wanted in the starting lineup. The GM finally sent a message to the manager when he traded away the manager's favourite player. It's in the movie Moneyball and based on the book of the same name.
I hate to be that "well, ackshually" guy, but that book/movie bother me and that plot point in particular was a bunch of malarkey. In that 2002 season, Hatteberg was already an every day player from the moment he got to Oakland. Except he was a DH. He was switched to first base, but had already taken over the position, well over a month before Carlos Pena was traded in a pretty standard mid-season baseball trade. Instead the book made Beane as some cowboy GM, who was forcing the hand of his dinosaur Manager (a guy they painted as a greedy jerkoff) so that he would see the light.There is a way to send a message to the coach. Back in the day MLBs Oakland As had to take drastic measures when their field manager wouldn't play the guys the team wanted in the starting lineup. The GM finally sent a message to the manager when he traded away the manager's favourite player. It's in the movie Moneyball and based on the book of the same name.
It's still a great thing to do when you have a problem coach playing the wrong guys. Trade the coach's players and force him to either follow the program or leave.I hate to be that "well, ackshually" guy, but that book/movie bother me and that plot point in particular was a bunch of malarkey. In that 2002 season, Hatteberg was already an every day player from the moment he got to Oakland. Except he was a DH. He was switched to first base, but had already taken over the position, well over a month before Carlos Pena was traded in a pretty standard mid-season baseball trade. Instead the book made Beane as some cowboy GM, who was forcing the hand of his dinosaur Manager (a guy they painted as a greedy jerkoff) so that he would see the light.
That book/movie really stretched the truth to the point of absurdity. The 2002 A's were an awesome team, with a ton of talent and chemistry, but the moneyball stuff just lionized the GM, made a bunch of people that worked with him into stock villains, and omitted some of the biggest reasons they were a great team. The truth is obviously a lot more nuanced, but that doesnt sell books or movie tickets.
Wasn't Pena playing in the minors at the time also? They really did Howe dirty, especially in the movie, since the A's had heavily been following analytics even under Beane's predecessor, Sandy Alderson--and Howe was bought in.I hate to be that "well, ackshually" guy, but that book/movie bother me and that plot point in particular was a bunch of malarkey. In that 2002 season, Hatteberg was already an every day player from the moment he got to Oakland. Except he was a DH. He was switched to first base, but had already taken over the position, well over a month before Carlos Pena was traded in a pretty standard mid-season baseball trade. Instead the book made Beane as some cowboy GM, who was forcing the hand of his dinosaur Manager (a guy they painted as a greedy jerkoff) so that he would see the light.
That book/movie really stretched the truth to the point of absurdity. The 2002 A's were an awesome team, with a ton of talent and chemistry, but the moneyball stuff just lionized the GM, made a bunch of people that worked with him into stock villains, and omitted some of the biggest reasons they were a great team. The truth is obviously a lot more nuanced, but that doesnt sell books or movie tickets.
Mike Matheson hasn't been offered in this entire thread?
It sounds like the Coyotes are aiming to keep Vejmelka. But he only has 2 more years left before becoming a UFA, and (unless the Coyotes win a lottery) it doesn't look like they will be really competitive in those 2 years. Of course, they could re-sign him next off-season. But if PIT 1st is in the conversation, you've got to think BA would reconsider whether Veggie is really part of the core.Finally a comment from a non-Pens fan who actually gets our situation.
Pens need a goalie by trade. Not sure our 1st gets us Saros, and that's understandable, but this is the type of return we are shooting for. We'd ideally like a guy somewhere in between Saros (too pricey) and Gibson/Vejmelka (would be welcomed, but we're happy to pay more than what these would cost if the piece is right).
Well, that part is certainly true. Unfortunately, too many of the dinosaurs on the NHL coaching carousel/boys club are so stuck in their ways about player usage (obsession with their favorite grinders, value nebulous "toughness" over actual quantifiable metrics that show a player is a net negative, etc) that the only way to stop them is to take away their toys.It's still a great thing to do when you have a problem coach playing the wrong guys. Trade the coach's players and force him to either follow the program or leave.
I had no idea about the Pena thing, but you're 100% right: It looks like Pena was demoted to AAA ball from mid-May until the trade. So not only was he NOT the "manager's guy" he wasnt even with the team. I'm starting to think "The Natural" is more fact based than this movie.Wasn't Pena playing in the minors at the time also? They really did Howe dirty, especially in the movie, since the A's had heavily been following analytics even under Beane's predecessor, Sandy Alderson--and Howe was bought in.
Makes sense, we know whomever the new GM takes will be someone Sullivan won't bother playing when he's ready, anyway.Moving it for either a goaltender or a LD that can play behind or above Pettersson.
Would Calgary be willing to do something around Hanifin + Markstrom for Ty Smith, the 1st, and small cap dump like Ruhwedel or Friedman?
Would Nashville or Winnipeg move Helle or Saros for a package involving it?
Blackwood is an RFA, we can work something out...
I wonder if Carter would waive to go home to LA (Anaheim) for a victory lap. If we could somehow add Gibson and Henrique, while dumping Carter, I'd empty the clip on picks and prospects to Anaheim.With retention at around $3m he'd be useful either replacing Zucker or more likely replacing Carter as the 3C
I'd do it.PIT 1st for Vejmelka + NYI '3rd?