Speculation: Pierre McGuire thinks Shattenkirk is headed to the Bruins - but was wrong

Status
Not open for further replies.

WhalerTurnedBruin55

Fading out, thanks for the times.
Oct 31, 2008
11,347
6,720
Just saying were doomed. Boston Bruins cup 2051. I'm ready

I don't tend to agree with you on a lot of things here, but I unfortunately agree it's going to be a while until we win anything again.

I think we have a few shining stars, but for the most part a lot of mediocrity and questionable moves (or lack of them) every season. Which could be said about most teams, but I think it's going to take Sweeney's draft picks to succeed at a much higher percentage than usual (since most of his pro-acquisitions have been mostly underwhelming or straight up bad) in order for this team to be top tier again.
 

KrejciMVP

Registered User
Jun 30, 2011
28,809
10,578
Tampa, Florida
I don't tend to agree with you on a lot of things here, but I unfortunately agree it's going to be a while until we win anything again.

I think we have a few shining stars, but for the most part a lot of mediocrity and questionable moves (or lack of them) every season. Which could be said about most teams, but I think it's going to take Sweeney's draft picks to succeed at a much higher percentage than usual (since most of his pro-acquisitions have been mostly underwhelming or straight up bad) in order for this team to be top tier again.

When Bergeron and Krejci break down even more (which is happening) who is going to step up? Chara is old and Pasta and Marchand are going to need centres to get them points. I dont see anything in the system worth getting excited about. And the habs just got Drouin! FML
 

Jean_Jacket41

Neely = HOF
Jun 25, 2003
25,698
14,217
With the smurfs
When Bergeron and Krejci break down even more (which is happening) who is going to step up? Chara is old and Pasta and Marchand are going to need centres to get them points. I dont see anything in the system worth getting excited about. And the habs just got Drouin! FML

Yeah. We are now doomed. :laugh:
 

Trap Jesus

Registered User
Feb 13, 2012
28,686
13,458
While I think Shattenkirk would be a fantastic addition, these are the types of contracts that can sink a team if it doesn't go as planned. He is going to get an absolutely massive deal. Still, this blueline would be absolutely filthy (perfect blend of puck-moving and stay-at-home D-men on every pairing, which is a huge key to success):

Chara-McAvoy
Miller-Shattenkirk
Krug-Carlo
 

TheReal13Linseman

Now accepting BitCoin
Oct 26, 2005
12,411
5,386
Nation's Capital
But I feel like a couple years ago when Shattenkirk's name first popped up in rumors, almost everyone here was excited about the possibility. At some point a few folks mentioned that he wasn't exactly a star in his own zone, and when the trade for him (with Loui) fell through, all of a sudden it became "phew, he's a lousy defenseman anyway". Since then when his name comes up an increasing number of people want to bash the guy's defense and claim he's just going to be overpaid and lousy in his own end.

I'm not about to tell anyone that he's Ray Bourque back there, but he's not a turnstyle either. He's more than adequate defensively, and oh by the way, guess how many active defenseman have more points per game than Kevin Shattenkirk? Three. Three active players, and only 37 all time. Karlsson, Subban and Letang. He's got more PPG than Doughty, Burns, Keith, Hedman, Weber, Yandle, etc.

Again, not arguing for him as I still don't see why he'd be a "need" and what would have to happen to our roster to sign him, but he'd be an excellent addition for any team. If we think David Krejci is worth $7.25M and David Backes is worth $6M, I'd happily pay Kevin Shattenkirk $7M.

I think most Cap fans are unhappy with his play.
 

SPLBRUIN

Registered User
Mar 21, 2010
12,332
12,505
McGuire must be the only one who thinks Shattenkirk is coming to Boston, every other rumor I have read doesn't even mention Boston as a possibility.
 

EON

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 31, 2013
8,052
1,705
Raleigh, NC
This would make no sense for Boston.

Shattenkirk is very good but they would barely have the cap to fit him in, and already have 4 RDs. McAvoy and Carlo are the future down the right side.

Boston needs a stopgap LD until Lindgren/Zboril/Lauzon are ready, and perhaps a good bottom six forward.
 

KrejciMVP

Registered User
Jun 30, 2011
28,809
10,578
Tampa, Florida
This would make no sense for Boston.

Shattenkirk is very good but they would barely have the cap to fit him in, and already have 4 RDs. McAvoy and Carlo are the future down the right side.

Boston needs a stopgap LD until Lindgren/Zboril/Lauzon are ready, and perhaps a good bottom six forward.

ok but Carlo put up 16 points, we need offence. 16 points aint getting it done. I hope the best of for the kid but goals and assists matter when trying to win hockey games.
 

compan

Registered User
Sep 30, 2009
8,223
3,051
Nashville
This would make no sense for Boston.

Shattenkirk is very good but they would barely have the cap to fit him in, and already have 4 RDs. McAvoy and Carlo are the future down the right side.

Boston needs a stopgap LD until Lindgren/Zboril/Lauzon are ready, and perhaps a good bottom six forward.

I'd prefer a top six forward. Backes isn't really producing to that Top 6 level. Neither is Vatrano or Spooner. I'd say the only true Top 6 forwards we have right now are Marchand, Bergeron, Pasta and Krejci.
 

NDiesel

Registered User
Mar 22, 2008
10,061
11,218
NWO
ok but Carlo put up 16 points, we need offence. 16 points aint getting it done. I hope the best of for the kid but goals and assists matter when trying to win hockey games.

I'm not sure why the offense we add needs to be on the backend. Wouldn't it make sense to, you know, use the cap to get a forward that can get us points?

And while goals and assists do matter in games the main point of a defenseman is to play defense, even in today's NHL.
 

ORR2Sanderson2ORR

Bobby Orr Scores
Aug 24, 2005
3,771
879
Everywhere
ok but Carlo put up 16 points, we need offence. 16 points aint getting it done. I hope the best of for the kid but goals and assists matter when trying to win hockey games.

Carlo is a future shutdown defenseman. We'll get plenty of offense from are back end with ChuckyMac and Krug, we don't need a defensive liability in the back end just because he brings some offense to the table the negative far out ways the positives way to much to even think about adding Shatty.

Did you see how much of a determinant he was in the last two playoffs. Teams were licking their chops when he was on the ice.

Besides all this Carlo see's the ice extremely well and has a great outbreak pass to start the transition to offense and most importantly he can play defense!
 

Seidenbergy

Registered User
Nov 2, 2012
7,302
3,075
ok but Carlo put up 16 points, we need offence. 16 points aint getting it done. I hope the best of for the kid but goals and assists matter when trying to win hockey games.

Clearly it's impossible for a 20 year old rookie defenseman to improve his offensive game. 16 pts is his ceiling.
 

Dellstrom

Pastrnasty
May 1, 2011
25,385
4,198
Boston
ok but Carlo put up 16 points, we need offence. 16 points aint getting it done. I hope the best of for the kid but goals and assists matter when trying to win hockey games.

Considering Carlo is primarily a shut down, stay at home defenseman, 16 points is actually pretty damn good. Oh, and it's his rookie season. If he can consistently put up 20-25 points in his prime while being a defensive wall and eating tons of minutes, there's really not much more you can ask out of him. We don't get close to winning the Cup in 11 without Seidenberg.

Goals matter, of course, but preventing goals matters too. Shut down #2/#3 guys are absolutely priceless. Good ones are very few and far between, losing Boychuk out of the blue left this team for the crows. We have one of the best offensive blueliners in Krug, and we're developing another with McAvoy. Those dynamic defensemen are great, but for every one of them you need a guy who can pick up their slack on our end of the ice.
 

Gee Wally

Old, Grumpy Moderator
Sponsor
Feb 27, 2002
76,418
98,111
HF retirement home
Two that seem close — if not done — are Trevor Daley (Detroit) and Dan Girardi (Tampa Bay).

The Rangers are determined to be modest, which takes them out of the Kevin Shattenkirk race unless something really changes. Buffalo is believed to be a serious suitor. There was some talk Dallas might try a short-term deal, but not sure where that stands after Marc Methot’s arrival.


http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/nhl-free-agency-buzz-rumblings-around-league/
 

BiggioRainesHOF

Registered User
May 19, 2017
522
163
Two that seem close � if not done � are Trevor Daley (Detroit) and Dan Girardi (Tampa Bay).

The Rangers are determined to be modest, which takes them out of the Kevin Shattenkirk race unless something really changes. Buffalo is believed to be a serious suitor. There was some talk Dallas might try a short-term deal, but not sure where that stands after Marc Methot�s arrival.


http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/nhl-free-agency-buzz-rumblings-around-league/

Those two signings would make the Bruins big UFA winners in the division by not being involved.
 

dredeye

BJ Elitist/Hipster
Mar 3, 2008
27,420
3,072
There's no way we can make it work cap wise. Shattenkirk will not be a Bruin
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad