Philly Flu - urban legend or based in reality?

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
We have these two HFboards users in particular who sound confident that the missing-games interpretation is a real one, and in particular @Canadiens Fan, also known as Todd Denault, is a published author whose research involves interviews with primary sources.

What they don't have is a bead on the original etymology, as Denault is operating in a world where the Philly Flu is already out in the air, and he's presumably asking his source "what's this I keep hearing about", at which point they might be inclined to yes-and him instead of challenging the idea.
If Todd Denault thinks it was common that NHL players were pretending to be sick or injured, and actually sitting out games in Philly because they were scared, then he's out-to-lunch.

The Philly Flu was indeed a real phenomenon, players were uncomfortable and disoriented, and intimidated in some cases. Ken Dryden has talked about, for example, he says playing in Philly was far beyond the feeling of playing anywhere else.

I think part of the confusion about this is that when people say "the Philly Flu", some people are talking about the general discomfort of playing against the Flyers in Philadelphia, and other people are talking about the missing games. And some people are confusing th two
 
Growing up about 4 blocks from the Spectrum in Philly, I was fortunate enough to witness the Flyers thuggery in person hundreds of times. While I believe the "Philly Flu" may be a tad overblown, there was a uniqueness to the Bullies brand of brutality. Sure, all teams had tough guys... some more than others. And a bunch of teams had pugilists meaner and tougher than the Flyers.

But, the thing about that Flyers was their wolfpack mentality. These guys were thick as thieves on and off the ice. They did everything together as a group -- dinners, softball tournaments, picnics, and charity events. They even had their sacred watering hole in South Jersey where everyone knew them by name. They were a family of misfit toys who were beloved in Philly... and they fed off that energy.

They were menacing. And because of Clarke, they didn't take nights off. He was the ringleader and had no off switch, which meant everyone to a man needed to be ready for warfare any given night. These maniacs would take a random Tuesday night and turn it into a 3.5-hour bloodbath.

More than the overall fisticuffs, I think the Philly Flu had more to do with the mindset heading into the Spectrum... teams knew the Flyers weren't mailing it in... Clarke wouldn't allow that. So there was no sneaking in, playing ho-hum, and leaving without bumps and bruises... the Flyers were dragging you into the fight whether you liked it or not.

The other advantage the Flyers had was their middleweights and skill guys were willing to dish it out, especially Clarke who was tenacious and downright ruthless with his stick.

So, I'm not sure how many times "players called in sick vs. Philly" but there are many documented stories of players (many tough ones) openly sharing the dread of crossing the bridge into South Philly and seeing the Spectrum appear through the murky, gray Philly sky.

The only other teams I can even think of who could match the Bullies in terms of intimidation, violence, and enforcer power were the Orr-era Bruins, Plager-era Blues, Probert-Kocur Wings, and early-90s Sabres. The difference with the Flyers is that they had the brutes and the pests... and no "break glass in case of emergency" button.
 
It is doubtful that players actually did pretend to be sick. NHLers have pride, there are plenty of minor leaguers that will take your place. I agree there was a general discomfort with the Broad Street Bullies. It was certainly intimidation. But the Orr/Espo Bruins wouldn't have been scared. The Cherry Bruins wouldn't have been nor would the Islanders. Heck, the Canadiens wouldn't have been either. Like I said, definitely a nervousness to it, but enough to pretend to be sick? Nah. Definitely an urban legend I think. Just like the idea that the visiting team bus would shake as it drove into the Spectrum.
 
from 1974 to 1976

At home / road, point percentage, home ice advantage was huge for them and the Bruins.
PHI: .845 / .597
BOS: .815 / .529
MTL: .752 / .672


Net penalties home / road

PHI: -246 / -353
BOS: -16 / -97
MTL: +51 / +13


That a lot of winning while giving a full power play a game to the opponent.
 
Last edited:
Having listened to a bunch of interviews with players, on Spittin’ Chiclets not the least, I’ve heard many stories relating to not ‘the Philly Flu’ specifically, but feeling uneasy, scared, having a hard time sleeping etc, prior to playing certain opponents. Enforcers in particular, they would be well aware of upcoming games and who they might have to fight and feel sick about it. Star players as well, I know Peter Forsberg has talked about it, that he would have sleepless nights worrying about playing this or that team and that they have this goon and this madman and things like that, but for whatever reason the anxiety washed off once playing and he was doing stupid shit that gave him the reputation being ‘fearless’. There’s this sequence of him playing the Blackhawks early in his NHL career where I think first he slashes Bob Probert, and when Probert returns to get even with him, Foppa gives him an elbow to the face. Jeremy Roenick wrote about this in his book, that Probert apparently said afterwards he didn’t get square with Forsberg because he respected him playing so ballsy.

Forsberg has also talked about I think that particular sequence, because he would always be getting lectures from Adam Deadmarsh back on the bench: “lesson 1: don’t elbow Bob Probert”, and so on. And of course it was Deadmarsh who had to take Forsberg’s fights, so it makes sense.

And Salming once did a radio chronicle where he spent a good portion talking about playing the Broad Street Bullies and Dave Schultz. I think very few players at the time relished playing the Flyers, I think many good players would have shrunk under the intimidation and just try to finish their shifts in one piece, but I hardly think the sick days were as prevalent as mythologized.

But because players apparently shrunk against certain teams, many would in time follow the Flyers’ lead and become meaner. I think it was Billy Smith talking about it in his Spittin’ Chiclets appearance, that the Islanders besides being bad in their first few years, were getting trounced on the scoresheets because they intimidated no one. A non-negligible part of them improving and becoming a contender was allegedly first making sure that although you might outscore them, you would pay if you tried to embarrass them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Staniowski
Growing up about 4 blocks from the Spectrum in Philly, I was fortunate enough to witness the Flyers thuggery in person hundreds of times. While I believe the "Philly Flu" may be a tad overblown, there was a uniqueness to the Bullies brand of brutality. Sure, all teams had tough guys... some more than others. And a bunch of teams had pugilists meaner and tougher than the Flyers.

But, the thing about that Flyers was their wolfpack mentality. These guys were thick as thieves on and off the ice. They did everything together as a group -- dinners, softball tournaments, picnics, and charity events. They even had their sacred watering hole in South Jersey where everyone knew them by name. They were a family of misfit toys who were beloved in Philly... and they fed off that energy.

They were menacing. And because of Clarke, they didn't take nights off. He was the ringleader and had no off switch, which meant everyone to a man needed to be ready for warfare any given night. These maniacs would take a random Tuesday night and turn it into a 3.5-hour bloodbath.

More than the overall fisticuffs, I think the Philly Flu had more to do with the mindset heading into the Spectrum... teams knew the Flyers weren't mailing it in... Clarke wouldn't allow that. So there was no sneaking in, playing ho-hum, and leaving without bumps and bruises... the Flyers were dragging you into the fight whether you liked it or not.

The other advantage the Flyers had was their middleweights and skill guys were willing to dish it out, especially Clarke who was tenacious and downright ruthless with his stick.

So, I'm not sure how many times "players called in sick vs. Philly" but there are many documented stories of players (many tough ones) openly sharing the dread of crossing the bridge into South Philly and seeing the Spectrum appear through the murky, gray Philly sky.

The only other teams I can even think of who could match the Bullies in terms of intimidation, violence, and enforcer power were the Orr-era Bruins, Plager-era Blues, Probert-Kocur Wings, and early-90s Sabres. The difference with the Flyers is that they had the brutes and the pests... and no "break glass in case of emergency" button.
Yes, definitely a wolfpack mentality. I said in another thread that the '95 Devils were a landmark team in NHL history. So we're the mid-'70s Flyers.

Basically, the whole team played like Bobby Clarke. Rough, aggressive, dirty...but smart, and disciplined in their own way. Very strong defensively, especially in limiting scoring chances.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad