This I would probably disagree with (if by "lead guy you mean "best player"). Where is the cutoff for how good the best player on a championship team needs to be? It would appear that you are putting it somewhere between Maxey and Jayson Tatum. I admit I'm a Sixers homer and Celtics hater but I think Tatum is one of the more overrated players in the NBA. He has never, in my opinion, belonged in the MVP conversation. So considering that the Celtics finally won it all with him as their best player (after failing to win it all with him as their best player for a bunch of years), where are you drawing the line?I think everyone loves Maxey. But there were some wild takes out there about how he could be a lead guy on a contender that were frankly insane.
To me it's all about roster construction. The Celtics weren't winning anything until they added Jrue/Horford/Porzingis/White. I mean, that's one hell of a supporting cast for your two star players. If you build a roster like that you don't need an MVP caliber player.
Last edited: