GDT: PHILA at COLO (1PM MT) The Last HURRAH of Erik JOHNSON to END THE WEEK

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
How did Drouin get a secondary assist on Nate’s goal? Drouin passed it to Nate, Nate passed it to Cale, then Cale back to Nate who scored. It should be Nate from Cale no secondary assist
 
Sammy just disappears in that hat.
Another angle
1738539223277.jpeg
 
A win is a win. But they played like ass. Lucky for us Philly can't score worth shit right now.

How did they play like ass lmao....


They had a slow start(Product of an afternoon game at home) but from about the 10 minute mark of the first onward they dominated :laugh:


Sometimes I wonder about your analysis.
 
How did they play like ass lmao....


They had a slow start(Product of an afternoon game at home) but from about the 10 minute mark of the first onward they dominated :laugh:


Sometimes I wonder about your analysis.

We could win a game 7-0, with the shots being 50 to 10 in our favour, and you'll likely have people complaining about those 10 shots against.
 
How did they play like ass lmao....


They had a slow start(Product of an afternoon game at home) but from about the 10 minute mark of the first onward they dominated :laugh:


Sometimes I wonder about your analysis.
The team had like 6 shots at the 15 min mark of the 2nd period. G scored on like our 10th shot around the 12 min mark of the 2nd, so basically half way through the game. Up until Gs goal they were extremely lack luster.

After that they were better for the rest of 2nd period. The 3rd was ok.

If they are playing a team that isn't as ice cold as Philly they probably lose something like 4-2.

We could win a game 7-0, with the shots being 50 to 10 in our favour, and you'll likely have people complaining about those 10 shots against.
Do you honestly think they played well? Or did you forget we had 10 shots on goal half way through the game.

It was another lack luster game where the effort was pretty mediocre. Winning the game doesn't mean they played well. It just means we played a team that is struggling hard core right now and we were able to score a few when they couldn't find the net.
 
Do you honestly think they played well? Or did you forget we had 10 shots on goal half way through the game.

It was another lack luster game where the effort was pretty mediocre. Winning the game doesn't mean they played well. It just means we played a team that is struggling hard core right now and we were able to score a few when they couldn't find the net.
We ended with 32 SOG and a shutout, and they had like less than 5 quality scoring chances.

The game isn't 25 minutes long
 
The team had like 6 shots at the 15 min mark of the 2nd period. G scored on like our 10th shot around the 12 min mark of the 2nd, so basically half way through the game. Up until Gs goal they were extremely lack luster.

After that they were better for the rest of 2nd period. The 3rd was ok.

If they are playing a team that isn't as ice cold as Philly they probably lose something like 4-2.


Do you honestly think they played well? Or did you forget we had 10 shots on goal half way through the game.

It was another lack luster game where the effort was pretty mediocre. Winning the game doesn't mean they played well. It just means we played a team that is struggling hard core right now and we were able to score a few when they couldn't find the net.


G scored on the 11th shot of the game. They had 14 shots at the halfway mark of the game.

1738542402125.png



Yeah, they legitimately played well :laugh: 59% xGF share, 63% scoring chances.


And that's even after the slow start where shots on goal were 9-2 at one point for Philly. From that point onward the Avs outshot them 30-15. Once they found their legs it was absolutely a dominant effort :laugh:


Like I said, I really dont think anyone can trust any analysis you provide at this point. Just clearly no idea.
 
G scored on the 11th shot of the game. They had 14 shots at the halfway mark of the game.

View attachment 971612


Yeah, they legitimately played well :laugh: 59% xGF share, 63% scoring chances.


And that's even after the slow start where shots on goal were 9-2 at one point for Philly. From that point onward the Avs outshot them 30-15. Once they found their legs it was absolutely a dominant effort :laugh:


Like I said, I really dont think anyone can trust any analysis you provide at this point. Just clearly no idea.
Adjusting for Philly being bad their xGF is only 42.4% against a competent hockey team.
 
I missed the game but based only on the score card it seemed like Mittelstadt had a decent outing.

I know he's not been lighting the lamp but I had a quick look at money puck and it seems like he's got a goals above expected of -0.7. that doesn't seem that bad. His stats seem better than it seemed he was playing.

Has he turned things around? I struggle reading these stats sometimes.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad