Confirmed with Link: [PHI/WPG] Kevin Hayes UFA rights for a 2019 5th

Status
Not open for further replies.

Adtar02

@NateThompson44 is a bum
Apr 8, 2012
4,954
5,829
2nd star 2 the right
That logic doesn't work.

It's the same as when TK was demoted... he was still great but his scoring and impact suffered because he was playing too little and with inferior players who held him back. This could easily go the same way and it's terrible for the team.
This isn’t quite the same. Tk benefits a lot from coots and g. While he is really good that’s next level teammates. Patrick at worst getting jvr, linblom, or Frost is still a lot of skill. Tk got who when sent down?

And when we moved g to center this past year in a few games Patrick started look much better. Playing a dominant style and started scoring. Same with the coots line. It’s funny cause at first it was all g jvr and tk. Then they got exposed defensively. Especially with our break out style that gordon went to.

To me the mistake was not switching one of voracek or linblom with tk or jvr. Would have helped a ton with possession and puck retrieval.
 

tictactoe

Registered User
Jan 15, 2017
18,799
9,802
We got Hayes, we'll get Talbot, and then we can sign Stralman and Giradi!
aint_funny.gif
 

Ghosts Beer

I saw Goody Fletcher with the Devil!
Feb 10, 2014
22,767
16,523
Well said. If they were going to get a free agent center it was down to Duchene and Hayes after Nelson re-signed. The competition and I believe the price will only get higher on 7/1 with multiple teams bidding for two guys. The alternative was to give up a high level pick or prospect and possibly a package of those to do so. Considering they might have to do that to get a top four D this was the smart move to make. Will they have to ''overpay'' for him, more than likely. That's the trade off for addressing a clear need with a free agent versus trading assets for someone. They just got much better though and assuming they can get him signed in the next week they can check off one box and move to the next area they need to upgrade.
Agreed. If they can lock up Hayes for the same 6 years, $36M that Brock Nelson got, it's a no-brainer and trading the pick will be well worth it. Now their center ice depth goes from poor to rock solid, and they can ice 3 solid lines without glaring weaknesses. It will be a big difference maker.
 

Striiker

Former Flyers Fan
Jun 2, 2013
90,276
156,936
Pennsylvania
6x6 wouldn’t be the worst thing in the world. It’s not good value, and I would be fine without it, but you don’t need to field a team of maximally efficient contracts in order to have success. Even if he’s just a 45 -50 point player, he would still make our roster better than it would be without him.

Building a team means maximizing talent. Not maximizing cap efficiency. Occasionally these two goals are in conflict with one another. Sometimes I think people really struggle with this concept.
I’m not worried about the cap space. I’m worried that his contract will earn him a guaranteed spot as 2C in the (I believe likely) scenario where Patrick outplays him and deserves it more.

While also potentially blocking Frost.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Captain Dave Poulin

HeyHanrahan

Registered User
Sep 20, 2018
118
530
PA
The player is decent. Just bracing myself for an albatross of a contract. I fear we endured years of salary cap hell for Fletcher to sign mediocre players to ridiculous contracts. Unless a team is ready to contend for the cup, free agency should be geared towards the bargain hunting rather than setting the market.
 

The Madrigal

Registered User
Apr 26, 2016
9,172
6,453
In a simulation
Lindblom, Vorobyov and TL is the past couple years, but go ahead, just keeping swallowing Chuck; He deserves you servitude.
Vorobyev was a fourth round pick. Laczynski was a 6th round pick. Perhaps you should bring correct facts to the table. Either way Vorobyev has proven nothing at the NHL level and if he had perhaps they wouldn't need to pick up Hayes. Laczynski hasn't even proven to be a good AHL'er yet. As far as Lindblom goes, congrats on naming ONE good 5th round pick the Flyers have made.

Complaining about giving up a 5th round pick to fill a big hole at second line center when your prospect pool is already loaded is beyond silly and invalidates your entire argument.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 46zone and hatcher

renberg

Registered User
Dec 31, 2003
7,231
7,495
Lewes Delaware
forums.hfboards.com
6X6 would be a fair contract for Hayes in this market. I don't see how CBJ can allow Duchene to leave since they're losing Panarin especially after what they gave up to acquire him. They're both going to hit the bank hard. The contracts signed by Tavares and Matthews will probably to be equalled by Marner and is setting the bar for top centers in the $10M per range.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ghosts Beer

The Madrigal

Registered User
Apr 26, 2016
9,172
6,453
In a simulation
Agreed. If they can lock up Hayes for the same 6 years, $36M that Brock Nelson got, it's a no-brainer and trading the pick will be well worth it. Now their center ice depth goes from poor to rock solid, and they can ice 3 solid lines without glaring weaknesses. It will be a big difference maker.
Agreed. I don't love Hayes at 6/36 but I don't think it's something that will come back to haunt them in any way. This is a a guy who just turned 27 years old in May coming off of his best NHL season. It's not like they would be investing 6 years in a 30 year old player whose best years are coming to a close.
 

Captain Dave Poulin

Imaginary Cat
Sponsor
Apr 30, 2015
68,590
201,337
Tokyo, JP
Why oh why couldn't Hextall fire Hakstol? Hextall never would have made this move.

Hexy deserved to be fired, but I was fully behind his roster construction, even if he was slow in giving some of the kids a shot.

This is a desperation move when it is entirely unnecessary. May pay off, but I am highly skeptical.

Not impressed with Fletcher so far.

****ing bingo, pal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: baudib1

LegionOfDoom91

Registered User
Jan 25, 2013
83,359
143,384
Philadelphia, PA
In an attempt to make everyone feel better, Boston signed David Backes to a 5 year $30 million contract back in 2016, and he was 32 at the time. He hasnt lived up to it but it hasnt held Boston back either.

So theres that.

:dunno:

Hayes just turned 27 so I’d hope he wouldn’t fall off a cliff like Backes did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rebels57

Random Forest

Registered User
May 12, 2010
14,636
1,331
I’m not worried about the cap space. I’m worried that his contract will earn him a guaranteed spot as 2C in the (I believe likely) scenario where Patrick outplays him and deserves it more.

While also potentially blocking Frost.
Let’s be honest, if Patrick isn’t *clearly* better than Hayes at some point in the near- or mid-term, then the issue will be with Patrick, not with Hayes or his contract.

I understand the concern about “blocking” young players, and sympathize to some extent, but the young players need to actually force the issue. Patrick is not close yet. And Frost is nothing yet.

If Patrick reaches that point, then we can bitch about AV if and when he decides to play Hayes over a hypothetically-improved Patrick. But signing a 6’5” 50 point middle 6 center won’t be the issue in that case.
 

Captain Dave Poulin

Imaginary Cat
Sponsor
Apr 30, 2015
68,590
201,337
Tokyo, JP
I've already moved on to the bargaining stage in the grief cycle...

"Well, Fletcher can just use one of our amnesty buyouts on Hayes after the next lockout."

Stiz, I did my best to make my peace months ago with the idea of acquiring him, because we knew 100% that this was going to happen. But all it really accomplished was to make me hate hockey.

**** off, Kevin, and **** off hard, UpChuck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stizzle and baudib1

Magua

Entirely Palatable Product
Apr 25, 2016
38,648
160,972
Huron of the Lakes
Lindblom, Vorobyov and TL is the past couple years, but go ahead, just keeping swallowing Chuck; He deserves you servitude.

Hogberg, Ersson, Lindblom, Cates, Kase.

It’s been a good round for them. Not saying they would strike gold again; not saying they can’t deal with a singular late round pick loss as a cost of business. But it’s definitely wrong to suggest they haven’t gotten great value from these picks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Starat327

LegionOfDoom91

Registered User
Jan 25, 2013
83,359
143,384
Philadelphia, PA
Columbus would have to give up their first round pick for 2020 unprotected if they were to re-sign Duchene.

They have their third rounder & Calgary’s seventh rounder for this upcoming draft.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheKingPin

lancer247

Registered User
Jan 16, 2007
4,781
888
If we are gonna waste money on someone like him we would he better of spending it on someone with legit upside like karlsson, Duchene or breadman. If we are going after middle tier guys hopefully we sign zuccarello next and have him feed that big clumsy oaf Hayes just like he did with rags.
You’re assuming they want to come here
 

Ghosts Beer

I saw Goody Fletcher with the Devil!
Feb 10, 2014
22,767
16,523
Agreed. I don't love Hayes at 6/36 but I don't think it's something that will come back to haunt them in any way. This is a a guy who just turned 27 years old in May coming off of his best NHL season. It's not like they would be investing 6 years in a 30 year old player whose best years are coming to a close.
6/36 is simply the going rate for a player of Hayes' caliber on the open market in 2019. I'd be completely fine with it. No, it's not a steal, but UFAs always come at a premium. That's the trade-off for not having to give up any assets to acquire the player. I think people tend to get stuck on contract values from years' past and struggle to recalibrate for inflation and expanding salary caps. Sort of like how older generations inevitably complain about the price of dinner at restaurants. Times change.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad

Ad