No, pointing out the comparisons with his age group in college is meaningless, because older college players for the most part are marginal NHL prospects, few top draft picks stay in college more than a couple seasons unless they're flops. So there's little point comparing him to that group - outperforming non-prospects doesn't tell you much.
A better comparison might be with high draft picks in their 2nd (and a few in their 3rd) NCAA season. That would give a sense how he's progressing against players picked much higher who were considered better shots at starting in the NHL. Reason to focus on year 2 is even top prospects can struggle their first college season, but should be excelling in year two (and gone after that).
When you look at NCAA scoring leaders, a sizeable proportion are older players who are non-prospects, the same in the CHL where you see a number of overage players on the leader board.