Petterson vs. Rantanen
- Thread starter hockeydog23
- Start date
- Status
flyfysher
Registered User
- Mar 21, 2012
- 6,760
- 5,485
I think Pettersson is capable of making this interesting but he certainly hasn’t for quite a while now
SillyRabbit
Trix Are For Kids
- Jan 3, 2006
- 9,940
- 10,837
Rantanen easily.
Even when he’s playing “poorly,” he’s still producing.
Sure, you could argue that MacKinnon helps boost his numbers, and it’s probably true to a certain extent, but he’s also shown that he can perform well when MacKinnon is out.
Rantanen’s production has been incredibly consistent and elite. He’s also the better goal scorer.
Pettersson has/had an argument when he was a 100 point, two way center. But he hasn’t been that in over a year, whereas Rantanen is currently #3 in NHL scoring.
Even when he’s playing “poorly,” he’s still producing.
Sure, you could argue that MacKinnon helps boost his numbers, and it’s probably true to a certain extent, but he’s also shown that he can perform well when MacKinnon is out.
Rantanen’s production has been incredibly consistent and elite. He’s also the better goal scorer.
Pettersson has/had an argument when he was a 100 point, two way center. But he hasn’t been that in over a year, whereas Rantanen is currently #3 in NHL scoring.
hamzarocks
Registered User
Pettersson is a star player
Rantanen is a superstar player
Not comparable
Rantanen is a superstar player
Not comparable
ItWasJustified
Registered User
- Jan 1, 2015
- 4,809
- 6,124
Hennessy
Ye Jacobites, by name
That's why I'm taking Nic Dowd over Kucherov.
ItWasJustified
Registered User
- Jan 1, 2015
- 4,809
- 6,124
spiny norman
Administrator
- Status
