The Faulker 27
Registered User
Hammond is a bad AHL goalie who got hot for a short period in the NHL. One of the biggest flukes in hockey history. This is a disturbing post honestly.
Hammond is a bad AHL goalie who got hot for a short period in the NHL. One of the biggest flukes in hockey history. This is a disturbing post honestly.
Exactly. Although Ottawa (Colorado) is going to be brutal unless they do something and is a clear front runner for Hughes.
Tar Heel, I go back to what Erik Cole had to say about Cam vs Scott Darling, the “command of the room” and the respect of the players, etc. It seemed like he was saying that really no goalie (or at least one that doesn’t have an extensive track record like a Fleury, etc) has a chance in that room.We made the most beloved goalie in franchise history walk to Chicago so we could save $1.5M on this guy.
**** my life.
And seriously, the whole "Cam was our rock" thing is as much a part of the problem as anything. More like an anchor that hasn't been good enough for years. Maybe whatever voodoo curse he has on other goalies, or the shadow of his "legend" being gone, will do us some good.
Yeah, and Ward was one of those duds. At least they're making a different mistake now.I can see the argument that Cam's presence was an obstacle for other goalies, but I also think it's just as likely this org just keeps signing duds. Legit starting Goaltenders are few and far between.
Tar Heel, I go back to what Erik Cole had to say about Cam vs Scott Darling, the “command of the room” and the respect of the players, etc. It seemed like he was saying that really no goalie (or at least one that doesn’t have an extensive track record like a Fleury, etc) has a chance in that room.
Which, in my mind and yours and probably the rest of us is stupid - but it’s not stupid if it’s true. That’s the only thing that matters. The past (Khudobin, Ellis, Lack, etc) indicates that there’s *something* not right.
I do think the Mrazek pickup is fine. Cheap and one year. It’s an attempt to switch things up while giving Darling at least another year to prove his 4 year contract isn’t a huge mistake. Maybe he’ll come into camp in shape and sober. That would be good.
Skinner seems like someone who could easily be a huge problem. The amount of on-ice whining he's done makes me wonder what it's like behind the scenes when things aren't going right or if he's not getting his way. What if Skinner is like one of his online fanboys/girls who cry nonstop when he's not getting the right linemates (even though he never utilizes them anyway), or not playing in OT (even though he sucks there) or the shootout (even though he sucks there). It would be unbearable.Oh the understood message behind the "culture needs to change" message was that we would be better without Skinner and Faulk than with them. The team wasn't going to come out and say it, but those guys could be lockeroom cancers that has been allowed to fester for way too long.
At least that's how I always took it.
Tar Heel, I go back to what Erik Cole had to say about Cam vs Scott Darling, the “command of the room” and the respect of the players, etc. It seemed like he was saying that really no goalie (or at least one that doesn’t have an extensive track record like a Fleury, etc) has a chance in that room.
Which, in my mind and yours and probably the rest of us is stupid - but it’s not stupid if it’s true. That’s the only thing that matters. The past (Khudobin, Ellis, Lack, etc) indicates that there’s *something* not right.
I do think the Mrazek pickup is fine. Cheap and one year. It’s an attempt to switch things up while giving Darling at least another year to prove his 4 year contract isn’t a huge mistake. Maybe he’ll come into camp in shape and sober. That would be good.
We should send both Svech and Necas back and save a year of their ELCs. To burn a year playing in front of 0.890 duo is a disservice to them both and is counter productive to the obvious tank job they are setting us up for.But we NEED to get this team rolling now. We can't afford to let this new crop of youngsters get used to losing, like the last crop they're now trading away did.
The idea that we can "try again next year" is hilarious. Yes, the goalie pool looks stronger for next off-season. But take away the ones that will likely re-sign with their current teams (IE: All the good ones), and you're left with basically the same pool that we struck out on this season.
So other than adding yet another year to the streak, wasting a year on the contracts of our good players, and adding even more ammunition to the growing reputation of a goalie graveyard, what's going to be different next year?
It may never happen. What then?I think this is a stop gap until Nedeljkovick is ready... Which can not happen soon enough.......