Toggle sidebar

Salary Cap: Pens Summer Salary Thread: We Hayes Dubas's offseason moves so far

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/
Status
Not open for further replies.
Big Friggin Dummy

Big Friggin Dummy

Registered User
Feb 22, 2019
25,175
24,045
McGroarty would be a sick pickup. Having two guys like Yager and McGroarty developing and potentially ready in place for when the team hits on one of those top-5 picks they'll be getting soon would probably speed up the rebuild by a ton.

But I dunno how you get McGroarty without using a 1st rounder or Yager, and that kind of defeats the purpose.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jacob, Dipsy Doodle, Trade and 3 others
SEALBound

SEALBound

Fancy Gina Carano
Sponsor
Jun 13, 2010
42,033
20,688
Kase sucks. He was never that great to begin with and he has a MAJOR health issue and injury history. Absolute waste of a contract slot. Unload Nieto, Eller, Acciari, Hayes...then we'll talk.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Victor Z
HandshakeLine

HandshakeLine

A real jerk thing
Nov 9, 2005
48,830
33,177
Praha, CZ
The Old Master said:
i like a kid that wants the head coaches' job and isn't shy about it. :laugh:
Click to expand...
Gotta respect that ambition for sure. :laugh:

Big Friggin Dummy said:
But I dunno how you get McGroarty without using a 1st rounder or Yager, and that kind of defeats the purpose.
Click to expand...
Kinda shows why it would have been nice to get a 1st for Jake or Petts or whoever, incidentally.
 
  • Like
Reactions: domaug, Dipsy Doodle and Big Friggin Dummy
Sidney the Kidney

Sidney the Kidney

One last time
Jun 29, 2009
56,340
48,223
Big Friggin Dummy said:
McGroarty would be a sick pickup. Having two guys like Yager and McGroarty developing and potentially ready in place for when the team hits on one of those top-5 picks they'll be getting soon would probably speed up the rebuild by a ton.

But I dunno how you get McGroarty without using a 1st rounder or Yager, and that kind of defeats the purpose.
Click to expand...
Too bad Buffalo doesn't own his rights. We could have just sent them one of our many 4C for him.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Rudy Russo, CheckingLineCenter and Big Friggin Dummy
AuroraBorealis

AuroraBorealis

Back-to-back hater
Oct 16, 2018
19,759
17,094
Vancouver, British Columbia
1721117833887.png
 
  • Wow
Reactions: BusinessGoose
SEALBound

SEALBound

Fancy Gina Carano
Sponsor
Jun 13, 2010
42,033
20,688
Big Friggin Dummy said:
McGroarty would be a sick pickup. Having two guys like Yager and McGroarty developing and potentially ready in place for when the team hits on one of those top-5 picks they'll be getting soon would probably speed up the rebuild by a ton.

But I dunno how you get McGroarty without using a 1st rounder or Yager, and that kind of defeats the purpose.
Click to expand...
I think what you do is try to use guys we've collected to get him. Something like Ponomarov + STL 2nd. Or Pickering + 2nd. You might even propose Koivunen. Realistically though, this is the situation that Dubas has discussed in the past - you collect guys like Pono, Koivunen, Cruz, etc so that you have the ability to discuss guys like McGroarty. If tomorrow, they announced Pono, Koivunen, Cruz for McGroarty, I would be stoaked. It's a 3 for 1 but that 1 is likely a blue chip. That is a piece that would fit us better right now.

The biggest thing going against us right now is the relatively overloaded bottom 6 roster.

Beauvillier, Hayes, Puustinen, Poulin, Eller, Acciari, Lizotte, Puljujarvi, Bemstrom...We have 9 bottom 6 guys pushing for a spot. I would think it would be hard to tell McGroarty: Oh yeah, we totally have an open spot for you! Play time for days over here in ol Pittsburgh!
CheckingLineCenter said:
would prefer exhausting other methods but I would do Yager for McGroarty
Click to expand...
I don't think I would. I think they like Yager and he progressing well. You are giving up a very positive relationship and development trajectory for a potentially iffy one. From a risk standpoint, you don't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KrisLetAngry
CheckingLineCenter

CheckingLineCenter

Registered User
Aug 10, 2018
8,977
9,696
SEALBound said:
I don't think I would. I think they like Yager and he progressing well. You are giving up a very positive relationship and development trajectory for a potentially iffy one. From a risk standpoint, you don't.
Click to expand...
KrisLetAngry said:
I'd rather just keep Yager at that point.
Click to expand...
I simply think McGroarty will be a far better player.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gurglesons and KrisLetAngry
Le Magnifique 66

Le Magnifique 66

Let's Go Pens
Jun 9, 2006
23,762
3,385
Montreal
Big Friggin Dummy said:
McGroarty would be a sick pickup. Having two guys like Yager and McGroarty developing and potentially ready in place for when the team hits on one of those top-5 picks they'll be getting soon would probably speed up the rebuild by a ton.

But I dunno how you get McGroarty without using a 1st rounder or Yager, and that kind of defeats the purpose.
Click to expand...
Has to be centered around Pickering +. The Jets are still "contending" they lost Monahan and a few other pieces, maybe Pickering, Eller and something else works for both teams!

CheckingLineCenter said:
I simply think McGroarty will be a far better player.
Click to expand...
He has to come cheap, not at the expense of Yager in my opinion with all the rumors we are hearing about him and his attitude. I'm not moving Yager for him right now because of those question marks!
 
  • Like
Reactions: KrisLetAngry
SEALBound

SEALBound

Fancy Gina Carano
Sponsor
Jun 13, 2010
42,033
20,688
eXile3 said:
1.44 ppg as a 19 year old in the NCAA. Can’t say I’ve watched the guy but that’s no joke. That kind of production usually translates well to the NHL.
Click to expand...
Which is why he was a 1st rounder, on WJC team, and highly coveted.

There's no question he's going to be a good player. I think teams are just wondering how much of their standard development path process they are willing to blow up for him, especially at the cost it will take to get him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KrisLetAngry
KrisLetAngry

KrisLetAngry

MrJukeBoy
Dec 20, 2013
18,901
5,143
Saskatchewan
Le Magnifique 66 said:
Has to be centered around Pickering +. The Jets are still "contending" they lost Monahan and a few other pieces, maybe Pickering, Eller and something else works for both teams!


He has to come cheap, not at the expense of Yager in my opinion with all the rumors we are hearing about him and his attitude. I'm not moving Yager for him right now because of those question marks!
Click to expand...
Pickering + Eller + 2nd.

I like it.

SEALBound said:
Which is why he was a 1st rounder, on WJC team, and highly coveted.

There's no question he's going to be a good player. I think teams are just wondering how much of their standard development path process they are willing to blow up for him, especially at the cost it will take to get him.
Click to expand...
One thing is shaking the boat for sure. If other prospects see a player push his way on you may upset other prospects. You would almost have to make sure he is NHL ready and tell him he has to hustle and play both ways
 
DesertPenguin

DesertPenguin

Registered User
Apr 22, 2015
3,245
1,750
Big Friggin Dummy said:
McGroarty would be a sick pickup. Having two guys like Yager and McGroarty developing and potentially ready in place for when the team hits on one of those top-5 picks they'll be getting soon would probably speed up the rebuild by a ton.

But I dunno how you get McGroarty without using a 1st rounder or Yager, and that kind of defeats the purpose.
Click to expand...
Well, if you really are trying to put pieces in place to help before the core retires, McGroarty will be ready a couple years sooner than whoever we draft with the 2025 first. So maybe you just go for it, with top 5 protection or something like that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KrisLetAngry
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Latest posts

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom
X