We should have tried to trade Kapanen for Kubalik. Both players were in the same boat. When Kubalik wasn't qualified, we should have signed him. That should have been the move over getting Granlund. Or Bonino. It could have saved us a signing or two in the offseason here as well.
That all said, it's not like Kubalik has been helping himself this season. The Senators have a pretty sexy Top 9:
Tkachuk - Stutzle - Giroux
Kubalik - Norris - Batherson
Joseph - Greig - Tarasenko
Though when you look at the lineups and how fans, at least, look at it, it's almost a 2016 Pens situation where you have Kunitz-Malkin-Rust and HBK. Which one is the 2nd line and which is the 3rd? It didn't really matter, both were used as offensive lines. Norris and Batherson are doing well and so is Joseph-Greig-Tarasenko. The odd man out in the entire top 9 is Kuablik who is 0-0-0 in GP. Which, given who he plays with, shouldn't be a thing. Ottawa isn't really running them as a defensive line either. Clearly, Tkachuk-Stutzle-Giroux is the top line and then it's like they have 2 2nd lines and then a 4th.
My worry seeing Kubalik's troubles is, "Well he's in an offensive position in Ottawa and clearly not doing well, how does he fair when he's put on the 3rd line with Zohorna and Eller and told to play low-event, low-risk hockey?" Does he fit with that bullshit Sullivan model? I have doubts. And make no mistake, that's much more on Sullivan than Kubalik.
If we want Kubalik here (and by most accounts, I would like that), Sullivan will have to change the 3rd line model of low-event, low-risk, play-to-even model. One win over the Avs doesn't mean Sullivan's system suddenly works. Sens will be running 3 scoring lines against us tonight. Our "2 scoring lines and 2 4ths lines prohibited from trying" will be exposed.