Gurglesons
Registered User
Lmao how are Reinhart and Tkachuk "taking risks"
Ah. I see we are a Monday Morning Quarterbacking on a Thursday.
Everyone on this board including you said Calgary absolutely destroyed Florida in that trade.
Lmao how are Reinhart and Tkachuk "taking risks"
He also had 12 points in 38 games in the year he was traded and 12 points in 52 games the year before. I absolutely think what they traded for him was taking a risk.
Ah. I see we are a Monday Morning Quarterbacking on a Thursday.
Everyone on this board including you said Calgary absolutely destroyed Florida in that trade.
Isn't the Karlsson trade the same type of risk? But since it didn't work out it doesn't count?
That has literally zero relevance for whether trading for Reinhart and Tkachuk were risks. Tkachuk had 104 points in 82 games the year before he was traded. Literally on what planet is trading for him a "risk"?
Trading a 1st and Levi for Reinhart is also not a risk, because Reinhart has always been a good player.
No no no no, we'll be cooked by then.The EK trade didn’t happen until August. Just saying.
Holy shit… NO
You mean like.. this?
No no no no, we'll be cooked by then.
Can you read the chart besides just noticing that it’s blue? His avg TOI is 4th line minutes, his competition is mid. His salary is 1 mil less than Malkin. That’s not good.
Smart move for a team with 30 mil cap space. Stop being dense. It’s one thing to have a little pet contrary opinion it’s another to waste full 3 pages on the salary cap thread complaining that the Pens didn’t take Vans cap dump against all logic.We're already cooked.
Total cope if you think Dubas is pulling off an EK65 type deal this season.
Which is why you acquire a 2nd to take him on.
Smart move.
Smart move for a team with 30 mil cap space. Stop being dense. It’s one thing to have a little pet contrary opinion it’s another to waste full 3 pages on the salary cap thread complaining that the Pens didn’t take Vans cap dump against all logic.
Honestly at this point I wonder if Dubas is trying to do stuff and it's just that nobody wants our garbage. I doubt teams are chomping at the bit to add Reilly Smith or Lars Eller.
@Gurglesons is gonna say I'm sipping from the copium straw. Maybe he's right.
Tbh though like I said earlier we have until July 2nd to see what the plan is. Not much is likely to happen after that. So I'm saving my vitriol (or praise in the off chance Dubas has a good off season) for then.
It can be both.
I think the Penguins have a lot of mediocre to flat-out bad contracts that will be a challenge to move without putting themselves in either roughly the same or even a worse spot. And I ALSO think Dubas is just kinda shrugging his way through these last Sid years because they are trying to take a "compromise" path that is frankly moronic and won't bear enough fruit in either direction they are waffling on.
Plus he doesn't actually run this team until I see otherwise. And his boss clearly doesn't like change or flexibility in thinking.
It can be both.
I think the Penguins have a lot of mediocre to flat-out bad contracts that will be a challenge to move without putting themselves in either roughly the same or even a worse spot. And I ALSO think Dubas is just kinda shrugging his way through these last Sid years because they are trying to take a "compromise" path that is frankly moronic and won't bear enough fruit in either direction they are waffling on.
Plus he doesn't actually run this team until I see otherwise. And his boss clearly doesn't like change or flexibility in thinking.
What's funny is that Dubas made all these grand proclamations when he came on board about how he'd look at every avenue to improve the team and yeah I haven't seen him do much of taking on bad contracts to add picks or grabbing young players with warts (PLD etc) just to take a home run shot at contending again.I just think it's funny how many people are unwilling to take on bad contracts for returns.
I remember how many people skewered me for proposing us taking Bob's contract if we could get Luostrainen as benefit.
Hm.
Lots of group think in here.
What's funny is that Dubas made all these grand proclamations when he came on board about how he'd look at every avenue to improve the team and yeah I haven't seen him do much of taking on bad contracts to add picks or grabbing young players with warts (PLD etc) just to take a home run shot at contending again.
Outside of the EK trade which was his one swing Dubas has been every bit as conservative a GM as Ron Hextall was.
And that sucks.
This org needs a Paul Holmgren type whose gonna do some lunatic shit. That's the only way they're getting out of the mess they're in. And even that might not work but hey at least you tried if you do that type of stuff.
But Kyle is playing it as safe as anyone.
What's funny is that Dubas made all these grand proclamations when he came on board about how he'd look at every avenue to improve the team and yeah I haven't seen him do much of taking on bad contracts to add picks or grabbing young players with warts (PLD etc) just to take a home run shot at contending again.
Outside of the EK trade which was his one swing Dubas has been every bit as conservative a GM as Ron Hextall was.
And that sucks.
This org needs a Paul Holmgren type whose gonna do some lunatic shit. That's the only way they're getting out of the mess they're in. And even that might not work but hey at least you tried if you do that type of stuff.
But Kyle is playing it as safe as anyone.
Conservatism wasn't Ron Hextall's problem. Hextall's problem was that he made a bunch of mind boggling bad moves.
Hextall never made a move as bad as Ryan Graves / potentially opening up to having a 1st that was not lottery protected.
I swear some of you just argue to argue.
Well even Hextall's "big moves" were half-in shit. Petry is a whatever move. So is Granlund. Hextall never wanted to make a truly big swing because he really didn't want to move first round picks or top prospects. And I can't really blame him for that but at the same time if all he was gonna trade for was mid ass players he shoulda just said f*** it and kept all of his picks and prospects and let the team fall where they may.Conservatism wasn't Ron Hextall's problem. Hextall's problem was that he made a bunch of mind boggling bad moves.
I'm so sick and tired of hearing "how hard it is to make moves" in the NHL.
GMs don't want to make moves. Look at Dubas' summer last year. He made a ton of UFA signings and then had EK fall in his lap and people acted like he was a god.
Well even Hextall's "big moves" were half-in shit. Petry is a whatever move. So is Granlund. Hextall never wanted to make a truly big swing because he really didn't want to move first round picks or top prospects. And I can't really blame him for that but at the same time if all he was gonna trade for was mid ass players he shoulda just said f*** it and kept all of his picks and prospects and let the team fall where they may.