Sullivan and Co - and perhaps Dubas (which puzzles and saddens me) - need that Billy Beane moment from Moneyball when they are talking FAs and drafting where the old guy says "he hits the ball well, it pops off the bat, he really drives it!" and Billy says "if he's a good hitter then why doesn't he hit good?" It was the moment in the movie where Billy Beane presented the first piece of pushback to the old ways of thinking about baseball. Then everything spawned from there. What's interesting is if you look at the scene, the scouts really humanized the player, and Billy sought to dehumanize them and look at actual performance and rate them on that.
I think we are seeing similar things with this organization, particularly with a guy like Harkins. Granted, when I see his hustle and energy, I don't immediately hate him. He's who people said he was so it's hard to be too mad at him personally. But at some point there has to be the ultimate question of "is he helping us win games or not?" and the truth is...no. Now yeah, there are a lot of guys that aren't helping us win but you have much more ability to fix small issues like Harkins as opposed to larger ones like Smith, Graves, Carter, etc. Tough with Nieto and Acciari out sure but that's why god gave us the waiver wire.
I'd be cycling through Hinostranza, Zohorna, Puustinen, and especially Poulin before I kept Harkins on the roster. I'd waive him like they did with Zohorna just to help facilitate being able to rotate some guys up to see if different combos might work. I HIGHLY HIGHLY HIIIIIGHLY doubt he gets claimed but if he does...oh well. That's a 7th-round pick player to acquire, and every team has one or two. We have 3-4.