It's fascinating how fans' perception of their team's players may change over time (this is not directed specifically at you ViD).
When Laine was signed for 4 years, there were many who thought the term was good or too short. I would have preferred trading, or if you couldn't find a good trade partner, signing him to a max 2-3 year deal that would have kept him more tradable while also giving him a chance to prove if he's worth locking up for more years.
Now as his value is at an all-time low, some of those same people who liked that extension want to move him? I really don't get it.
I think that the Jackets are in a situation where -- instead of moving an overpaid veteran -- it might be smart to move at least one of their young ELC forwards that have question marks in their game but are also gifted and viewed as potential top-6 forwards.
If you re-sign Johnson, Bemstrom, Marchenko, Texier, Sillinger and Chinakhov and decide to keep them all beyond next offseason, most likely some of them will experience a drop in value eventually. There are only so much lineup spots and ice time.
Pending RFAs I would try to sign to long-term extensions: Marchenko, Texier
Pending RFAs I would be open to trading if offer is fair: Johnson, Sillinger
Pending RFAs I would actively try to move for a fair return (picks, prospects): Chinakhov, Bemstrom