Pastrnak or Kovalchuk?

Who was better at their peak?

  • Pastrnak and it's not even close

    Votes: 4 5.2%
  • Pastrnak but it's close

    Votes: 19 24.7%
  • Tied

    Votes: 2 2.6%
  • Kovalchuk but it's close

    Votes: 28 36.4%
  • Kovalchuk and it's not even close

    Votes: 24 31.2%

  • Total voters
    77

Aashir Mallik

Registered User
Apr 19, 2019
12,433
13,172
Let me just preface saying I never watched Kovalchuk so I only have his stats to go off of, if I’m wrong feel free to correct me:

Kovalchuks best season was either 03-04 or 11-12

In 03-04 he had 87 in 81, won the rocket (tied totals with 2 others), 2nd in points and 8th in PPG but a couple guys only played 40ish games, and finally 10th in the hart. The impressive fact was that he outscored his second best teammate by 32 points and 21 goals. The team as a whole was not good, as they were 20th in the league in standings

In 11-12 he had 83 in 77, came 6th in rocket, 5th in points and 5th in PPG (Crosby only played 20ish games), and finally 10th in hart again. Gap between teammates wasn't as impressive as he had a 5 point game and 11 goal gap. The team was solid and made the playoffs as WC but were 8th in the league. Again he was good in the playoffs leading the team by 4 points and tied for scoring on his team, 3rd in the league in points too,

from the stats it's close but 03-04 Kovalchuk looks like his peak form, he outpaced his teammates by an absurd rate and was a goal scoring machine.

Pastrnak's best season is either 19-20 or 22-23

In 19-20 he had 95 in 70, won the rocket (tied with Ovi), tied 3rd in points and 4th in PPG and 4th in hart. He outscored his second teammate by 18 points but 17 goals. The team won the presidents trophy and he was alright in the playoffs with 10 in 10.

In 22-23 he had 113 in 82, came 2nd in rocket, 4th in points and T-4th in ppg and 2nd in hart. He outpaced second place on his team by 46 points and 34 goals. The team was next level as they were one of the best regular season teams of all time....but then the playoffs happened where he scored goals but didn't do much else.

If pastrnak had won a cup or even had an elite playoff run in either I think I'd vote him pretty easily for peak, but since both years he wasn't amazing I think it becomes closer. I'm gonna go homer vote and say pastrnak since I've watched him and how he tears the leafs apart and he has done the same stuff regular season wise as kovalchuk but gotten higher in the hart voting.
 

Sky04

Registered User
Jan 8, 2009
29,664
18,987
Pasta from an objective view but Kovalchuk was one of the most fun players to watch. Size, speed, hands and a lethal shot, his hands at top speed was probably the best in the league until McDavid/Mackinnon came along.

Is there a forward with a more lethal one timer from the point like Kovalchuk's was? Everyone else plays the half wall but Kovalchuk was scoring a ton from just inside the blue line.
 

Regal

Registered User
Mar 12, 2010
26,415
16,297
Vancouver
Pasta’s best seasons have an argument statistically for sure but I just never feel like he’s as elite as his numbers for some reason the same way I did with Kovy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: banks

biturbo19

Registered User
Jul 13, 2010
27,207
12,353
Kovalchuk would've absolutely murdered today's NHL. He played a lot of his prime in an era that was far less permissive of goal-scoring and still beats out Pasta i think.

He also played most of his prime without anything resembling a #1C. Whereas Pasta has largely spent his career playing with quality centers, even if it's the tail end of their careers. Last year sorta being the "gotcha" to things, but also still really just not enough to convince me.
 

banks

Only got 3 of 16.
Aug 29, 2019
3,822
5,610
For a little while there Kovalchuk was, in my opinion, the next best player after Crosby/Ovie/Malkin during their big 3 heyday.

During his time with Atlanta, Kovy WAS the Thrashers. He carried that team like prime Nash did for the Bluejackets. Every single one of his shifts tilted the ice in their favour, and then they tried to hold on for dear life until he could get back on for his next shift.

The stats make it seem close. But I wouldn't care if the stats were a decisive win for Pastrnak. This is Kovy without a slight hesitation.
 

PB37

Mr Selke
Oct 1, 2002
26,260
21,979
Maine
Both have a Richard Trophy but Pasta has hit 60 goals once and 100 points twice, all of which Kovalchuk has never done. Pasta also has two top 5 Hart Trophy finishes, 3 All Star nominations while Kovalchuk has just 2 All Star nominations and best finish was 10th for the Hart. I think Pasta has more accolades in his peak than Kovalchuk.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aashir Mallik

AvroArrow

Registered User
Jun 10, 2011
18,915
20,150
Toronto
Both have a Richard Trophy but Pasta has hit 60 goals once and 100 points twice, all of which Kovalchuk has never done. Pasta also has two top 5 Hart Trophy finishes, 3 All Star nominations while Kovalchuk has just 2 All Star nominations and best finish was 10th for the Hart. I think Pasta has more accolades in his peak than Kovalchuk.
Goal scoring is significantly higher today than when Kovalchuk played. His 50 goal seasons would pretty easily be 60 goal seasons in the modern NHL.

Close but I give Kovalchuk the edge, plus his linemates were nowhere near as good as Bergeron/Marchand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Voight

PB37

Mr Selke
Oct 1, 2002
26,260
21,979
Maine
Goal scoring is significantly higher today than when Kovalchuk played. His 50 goal seasons would pretty easily be 60 goal seasons in the modern NHL.

Close but I give Kovalchuk the edge, plus his linemates were nowhere near as good as Bergeron/Marchand.

While the scoring is close when taking that into account, Pasta has had two of his peak seasons that were considered Hart Trophy worthy to place in the top 5 in those respective years, as well as 3 end of the year All Star finishes. Kovalchuk never finished higher than 10th for the Hart in his years and only has 2 All Star finishes as one of the best in his position.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AvroArrow

Video Nasty

Registered User
Mar 12, 2017
5,640
9,836
Goal scoring is significantly higher today than when Kovalchuk played. His 50 goal seasons would pretty easily be 60 goal seasons in the modern NHL.

Not so sure about that. One of his two 52 goal seasons came during a year with similar scoring and power plays were juiced through the roof (he also happened to lead the league in PPG). The other year was a couple years later during a time where scoring was certainly lower, but still not for top stars as some have mentioned about the lean 2013-2017 years.

Just don’t see where those seasons easily turn into 60 goal campaigns. Maybe he does pot 60 one time, but I don’t think it would be simple.
 

sensfan4lifee

Registered User
May 21, 2024
370
419
Both have a Richard Trophy but Pasta has hit 60 goals once and 100 points twice, all of which Kovalchuk has never done. Pasta also has two top 5 Hart Trophy finishes, 3 All Star nominations while Kovalchuk has just 2 All Star nominations and best finish was 10th for the Hart. I think Pasta has more accolades in his peak than Kovalchuk.
Kovy played in the dead puck era
 

joestevens29

Registered User
Apr 30, 2009
54,029
17,154
Kovy was stuck in a bad situation. No linemates for much of his peak and on a club that was horrible and didn’t get much media attention to help garner hardware
 
  • Like
Reactions: banks

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad